Metaphorical Models in Motivational Discourse: A Study of Anglo-American Commencement Speeches

As a key genre of motivational discourse, the commencement speech relies on a stable set of conceptual metaphors to achieve its pragmatic impact. This study aims to identify and systematize the key metaphorical models that structure this genre, using a cognitive-discursive approach that combines qualitative and quantitative methods. The material includes speeches delivered by prominent Anglo-American speakers (politicians, actors, comedians, writers, singers, entrepreneurs, scientists) as well as two Russian-speaking writers (A. Solzhenitsyn and I. Brodsky), to graduates of universities in the USA and the UK in the 20th and 21st centuries. Apart from fully lexicalized ontological and orientational metaphors, twelve major groups of structural metaphors were identified, based on the following source domains (in descending frequency): journey, construction, game, war, teaching, books, machines, plants, animals, food, health/medicine, light and darkness. Special attention is paid to the correlation between speakers’ professional identity and the metaphors they use. The article examines both conventional and original metaphorical expressions that verbalize conceptual mappings. The analysis reveals that these metaphorical models shape the discursive practices of this genre within the broader framework of motivational discourse. The results demonstrate that metaphors not only render complex abstract ideas – such as success and failure, moral values, lessons from the past, personal and global goals – more accessible and vivid, but also serve to strengthen the speaker’s emotional connection with the audience, enhance the persuasive effect of discourse, and structure speech. The article demonstrates which facets of meaning are conveyed through each metaphorical model, what functions they perform, and what impact they have. This study contributes to the understanding of how language, culture, and cognition interact in the context of the cognitive-discursive approach and may be of interest to researchers in the fields of cognitive linguistics, rhetoric, intercultural communication, and discourse analysis.

1. Baranov, A.N., & Dobrovolsky, D.O. (Eds.). (2001). Anglo-russkij slovar’ po lingvistike i semiotike. Ok. 9000 terminov. 2-e izd., ispr. i dop. [English-Russian Dictionary of Linguistics and Semiotics. 9000 terms. Second edition, revised and extended]. Moscow: Azbukovnik (in Russian).

2. Arutyunova, N.D. (1990). Diskurs [Discourse]. In Lingvisticheskij entsiklopedicheskij slovar’ [Linguistic Encyclopedic Dictionary] (pp. 136-137). Moscow: Sovetskaya entsiklopediya [Soviet Encyclopedia] (in Russian).

3. Baranov, A.N. (2004). Metaforicheskie modeli kak diskursivnye praktiki [Metaphorical models as discursive practices]. Izvestiya Rossiiskoi Akademii Nauk. Seriya Literatury i Yazyka [The Bulletin of the Russian Academy of Sciences: Studies in Literature and Language], 63(1), 33-43 (in Russian).

4. Baranov, A.N. (2004a). Predislovie redaktora [Editor’s foreword]. In G. Lakoff & M. Johnson, Metafory, kotorymi my zhivyom [Metaphors We Live By] (A.N. Baranov and A.V. Morozova (Trans.) (pp. 7-22). Moscow: Editorial URSS (in Russian).

5. Baranov, A.N., Mikhailova, O.V., Satarov, G.A., & Shipova, E.A. (2004). Politicheskij diskurs: metody analiza tematicheskoj struktury i metaforiki [Political discourse: Methods of thematic structure and metaphor analysis]. Moscow: INDEM Foundation (in Russian).

6. Galichkina, E.N. (2015). Naputstvennaya rech’ vypusknikam kak rechevoj zhanr [Commencement speech as a separate genre]. Gumanitarnye nauki i obrazovanie [The Humanities and Education], 4(24), 109–113 (in Russian).

7. Ivanova, S.V. (2015). Lingvokul’turnye osobennosti precedennogo zhanra “aktovaya rech’” [Linguocultural Peculiarities of the Precedent Genre of Commencement Speech]. In Magiya INNO: Novoe v issledovanii yazyka i metodike ego prepodavaniya. Tom 1 [MAGIA INNO: new in language research and teaching methods. Volume 1]: proceedings of the Second scientific and practical conference, Moscow, April 24-25, 2015 (pp. 58-64) (in Russian).

8. Ivanova, S.V. (2017). Aktovaya rech’ kak gibridnaya polidiskursivnaya praktika [Commencement speech as a hybrid polydiscursive practice]. Vestnik Rossiiskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Lingvistika [Russian Journal of Linguistics], 21(1), 141–160 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.22363/2312-9182-2017-21-1-141-160

9. Kozhukhova, I.V. (2022). Zhanroobrazuyushchie i strukturnye kharakteristiki naputstvennoj rechi [Genre and structure peculiarities of commencement speech]. Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State University], 9(467), 91-97 (in Russian). doi:10.47475/1994-2796-2022-10912

10. Kostina, I.M. (2021). Naputstvennaya rech’ vypusknikam: semantika i pragmatika (na materiale rechi Mishel’ Obamy) [Commencement speech: semantics and pragmatics (based on Michelle Obama’s speech)]. In A.V. Fedoryuk (Ed.), Lingvistika i lingvodidaktika v svete sovremennykh nauchnykh paradigm. Vypusk 4 [Linguistics and Language Teaching in the Light of Contemporary Scientific Paradigms. Issue 4]: Collected Papers (pp. 44–52). Irkutsk: Irkutsk State University (in Russian).

11. Kryukova, N.F. (2000). Metaforika i smyslovaya organizatsiya teksta [Metaphor and Semantic Structure of the Text]. Tver: Tver State University (in Russian).

12. Kuzmina, N.V. (2020). Funktsional’no-kommunikativnye osobennosti tekstov zhanra «Commencement speech» v angliyskoy lingvokulture [Functional and communicative features of the texts of the genre “commencement speech” in the English language culture]. In Yu.V. Podkovyrin (Ed.), Filologiya, inostrannye yazyki i mediakommunikatsii: materialy simpoziuma XV (XLVII) Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii, posvyashchennoy 45-letiyu Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, Kemerovo, 01–30 aprelya 2020 goda [Philology, Foreign Languages and Media Communications: Proceedings of the 15th (47th) International Scientific and Practical Conference, dedicated to the 45th Anniversary of Kemerovo State University, Kemerovo, April 1–30, 2020], Vol. 21, 452–455. Kemerovo: Kemerovo State University (in Russian).

13. Panchenko, N.N. (2023). Motivatsionnyj diskurs: problemy i perspektivy issledovaniya [Motivational discourse: issues and prospects of study]. Izvestiya Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo sotsial’no-pedagogicheskogo universiteta. Filologicheskie nauki [Ivzestia of the Volgograd State Pedagogical University. Philological Sciences], 2(2), 4–8 (in Russian).

14. Podolyak, Zh.I. (2016). K voprosu o vydelenii motivatsionnogo diskursa [On the identification of motivational discourse]. Gumanitarnye nauchnye issledovaniya [Humanities scientific researches], 5 (in Russian). https://human.snauka.ru/2016/05/14850

15. Prusova, P.V. (2022). Lingvoritoricheskie osobennosti naputstvennykh rechey vypusknikam vysshikh uchebnykh zavedeniy (na materiale rechey amerikanskikh politikov) [Linguistic and rhetorical features of parting speeches to graduates of higher educational institutions (based on the speeches of American politicians)]. In E.E. Chikina (Ed.), Mir – Yazyk – Chelovek: Materialy V Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii, Vladimir, 29 noyabrya 2023 goda [World – Language – Human: Proceedings of the 5th International Scientific and Practical Conference, Vladimir, November 29, 2023] (pp. 327–335). Vladimir: Vladimir State University named after A. G. and N. G. Stoletov (in Russian).

16. Saltanova, P.A. (2022). Lingvostilisticheskie osobennosti rechi na tseremonii vrucheniya diplomov [Lexico-stylistic peculiarities of commencement speech]. Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo lingvisticheskogo universiteta. Gumanitarnye nauki [Vestnik of Moscow State Linguistic University. Humanities], 8(863), 91–98 (in Russian). doi:10.52070/2542-2197_2022_8_863_91

17. Fakhrutdinova, D.R. (2019). Lingvoritoricheskie parametry naputstvennoy rechi [Linguistic and rhetorical parameters of commencement speech]. Ritorika. Lingvistika [Rhetoric. Linguistics], 14, 270–280 (in Russian).

18. Chernova, S.V. (2016). Klassifikatsiya osnovnykh elementov kompozitsionno-smyslovoy struktury zhanra “naputstvennaya rech’ vypusknikam” [Classification of basic elements of compositional-semantic structure of “commencement speeches”]. Filologicheskie nauki v MGIMO [Linguistics & Polyglot Studies], 7(7), 181–191 (in Russian).

19. Chudinov, A.P. (2004). Kognitivno-diskursivnoe issledovanie metafory v tekstakh SMI [A cognitive-discursive study of metaphor in media texts]. In Yazyk SMI kak ob’ekt mezhdistsiplinarnogo issledovaniya: uchebnoe posobie [Media Language as an Object of Interdisciplinary Study: Coursebook] (pp. 175-197). Moscow State University Press (in Russian).

20. Kövecses, Z. (2010). Metaphor: A Practical Introduction (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

21. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2003). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226470993.001.0001

22. Podolyak, Zh.I. (2018). Spoken Genres of Motivational Discourse. Znanstvena misel Journal, 22, 48–49.

23. Pragglejaz Group. (2007). MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 22(1), 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926480709336752

24. Semino, E. (2008). Metaphor in Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

25. Zadornova, V.Ya., & Gorokhova, A.V. (2016). Metafory-zombi: priemy “ozhivleniya” mertvykh metafor i metaforicheskikh klishe (na materiale proizvedeniya T.E.Lourensa «Sem’ stolpov mudrosti») [The “Revival” of Dead and Cliched Metaphors in T. E. Lawrence’s “Seven Pillars of Wisdom”]. In E.V. Mikhailovskaya, I.N. Fomina (Eds.), Akhmanovskie chteniya – 2015: Materialy konferentsii [Akhmanov Readings – 2015: Conference Proceedings] (pp. 155-162). Moscow: Universitetskaya Kniga (in Russian).