Political Narratives in the Presidential Discourse of Yamandú Orsi and Their Linguistic Representation

Uruguay is currently one of the most socially, economically, and politically stable countries in Latin America, which renders the analysis of political narratives as tools of strategic institutional communication in the presidential discourse of Yamandú Orsi particularly relevant. The theoretical framework draws on political linguistics, integrating the critical discourse analysis of N. Fairclough, the socio-cognitive approach of T. van Dijk, the discourse-historical method of R. Wodak, and the rhetorical-critical approach of J. Charteris-Black. The aim of the study is to identify the key political narratives in Orsi’s discourse and analyze their linguistic representation and discursive functions. The methodological toolkit includes critical discourse analysis, narrative analysis, and linguo-ideological analysis. The empirical material comprises 34 public speeches delivered by Orsi between March 1, 2025, and April 18, 2026. The analysis identifies the mechanisms of strategic construction of a positive institutional image of Uruguay both domestically and internationally, as well as the nationally specific features of the leader’s rhetoric. The study reveals five key political narratives structuring the presidential discourse. First, democracy is conceptualized as the foundation of state stability and social cohesion. Second, pluralism and the alternation of power are presented as essential principles of democratic development that ensure a balance of interests. Third, continuity of power is interpreted as a guarantee of stability, fostering political predictability. Fourth, economic and social stability is portrayed as a direct consequence of political stability. Finally, peaceful coexistence – both domestically and internationally – is presented as a prerequisite for sustainable development. Collectively, these narratives, expressed through diverse linguistic mechanisms (ideologemes, metaphors, syntactic parallelism), construct an image of Uruguay as a stable state oriented toward dialogue, social justice, and international cooperation. The findings contribute to the study of nationally specific varieties of Latin American political discourse.

1. Bezrodnaya, A.Yu. (2013). Razlichie ponyatiy «kontsept» i «ideologema» [On differences between the notions “concept” and “ideologeme”]. Vestnik Irkutskogo gosudarstvennogo lingvisticheskogo universiteta [Irkutsk State Linguistic University Bulletin], 3(24), 138– 145. (in Russian)

2. Bocharov, E.V. (2024). Strategija samoreprezentacii i rechevye taktiki v politicheskom diskurse (na materiale publichnyh vystuplenij politikov Latinskoj Ameriki v OON) [Self-presentation strategy and speech tactics in political discourse (based on the public speeches of Latin American politicians at the UN)]. Vestnik NGU. Serija: Lingvistika i mezhkul’turnaja kommunikacija [Vestnik NSU. Series: Linguistics and Intercultural Communication], 22(1), 120–131 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.25205/1818-7935-2024-22-1-120-131

3. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

4. Charteris-Black, J. (2011). Politicians and rhetoric: The persuasive power of metaphor (2nd ed.). Palgrave Macmillan.

5. Chesnokova, O.S., Kotenyatkina, I.B., & Gishkaeva, L.N. (2024). Diskursivnye praktiki nacional’noj identichnosti: gimn Argentiny kak poliparadigmal’naja sushhnost’ [Discursive practices of national identity: the Argentine anthem as a multi-paradigmatic entity]. Vestnik SPbGU. Yazyk i literatura [Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Language and Literature], 21(4), 976–993 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu09.2024.412

6. Davtyan, Yu.V., & Kryukova, E.V. (2022). Religioznaja konceptosfera sovremennogo politicheskogo diskursa v Latinskoj Amerike [Religious Conceptual Sphere in the Modern Political Discourse of Latin America]. Vestnik Severnogo (Arkticheskogo) federal’nogo universiteta. Serija «Gumanitarnye i social’nye nauki» [Vestnik of Northern (Arctic) Federal University. Series “Humanitarian and Social Sciences”], 22(5), 51–59 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.37482/2687-1505-V204

7. Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. Long man.

8. Filatkina, G.S. (2015). Instrumenty rechevogo manipulirovanija v politicheskom diskurse Ugo Chavesa (1999–2012) [Speech manipulation in the political discourse of Hugo Chávez (1999–2012)]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Serija 21. Upravlenie (gosudarstvo i obshhestvo) [Lomonosov Public Administration Journal. Series 21], 1, 14–29 (in Russian).

9. Grassetti, J. (2020). El discurso político de Nayib Bukele en Twitter. Cuadernos del Centro de Estudios de Diseño y Comunicación, 112, 205–224 (in Spanish). https://doi.org/10.18682/cdc.vi112.4102

10. Jeifets, V.L., & Konovalova, K.A. (2022). Latinoamerikanskaja integracija na fone «pravogo povorota»: mezhdu irrelevantnost’ju i poiskom novyh smyslov [Latin American integration against the backdrop of a conservative wave: between irrelevance and the search for new meanings]. Vestnik Rossijskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Serija: Mezhdunarodnye otnoshenija [Vestnik RUDN. International Relations], 22(3), 447–463 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-0660-2022-22-3-447-463

11. Larionova, M.V. (2024). Latinoamerikanskij civilizacionnyj diskurs: toponimy kak patterny kul’turnoj identichnosti [Latin American civilizational discourse: toponyms as pat terns of cultural identity]. Jazyk i kul’tura [Language and culture], 67, 32–57 (in Russian).

12. Larionova, M.V. (2025). Svoj sredi chuzhih, chuzhoj sredi svoih: o latinoamerikanskoj identichnosti skvoz’ prizmu jetnonimov latinoamericano/latin, hispanic [One of our own among strangers, a stranger among our own: on Latin American identity through the prism of the ethnonyms latinoamericano/latin, hispanic]. Iberoamerikanskie tetradi [Iberoamerican Papers], 13(3), 39–63 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.46272/2409-3416-2025-13-3-39-63

13. Malysheva, E.G. (2009). Ideologema kak lingvokognitivnyj fenomen: opredelenie i klassifikacija [Ideologeme as a linguocognitive phenomenon: definition and classification]. Politicheskaja lingvistika [Political linguistics], 4(30), 32–40 (in Russian).

14. Moiseenko, L.V. (2019). Populistskij politicheskij diskurs: diagnosticheskie priznaki i lingvokognitivnye priemy sozdanija [Populism in political discourse: diagnostic features and linguo-cognitive techniques of formation]. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Serija 2: Jazykoznanie [Science Journal of Volgograd State University. Lin guistics], 18(2), 105–117 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.15688/jvolsu2.2019.2.10

15. Ostrovskaya, T.A., & Khachmafova, Z.R. (2024). Politicheskij narrativ telegram-kanalov: marginalizacija jazyka ili jazykovaja aktualizacija sociokul’turnoj situacii? [The political narrative of Telegram channels: marginalization of language or linguistic actualization of the socio-cultural situation?]. Politicheskaja lingvistika [Political linguistics], 5(107), 34– 41 (in Russian).

16. Popova, Z.D., & Sternin, I.A. (2007). Kognitivnaya lingvistika. [Cognitive linguistics]. AST: Vostok-Zapad (in Russian).

17. Riessman, C.K. (2008). Narrative methods for the human sciences. Sage.

18. Selivanova, I.V. (2022). «Latinoamerikanskaya Shvejcariya» [“Latin American Switzerland”]. Latinskaya Amerika [Latin America], 1, 101–109 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.31857/S0044748X0018057-1

19. Skrynnikova, I.V., & Generalova, L.M. (2024). Obraznye narrativy v politicheskoj blogosfere: lingvokognitivnyj aspekt [Figurative narratives in political blogging: linguocognitive perspective]. DISKURS [DISCOURSE], 10(4), 121–133 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.32603/2412-8562-2024-10-4-121-133

20. Slimovich, A. (2016). Política y redes sociales en Argentina. El caso de los candidatos presidenciales de 2011 en Twitter. Signo y Pensamiento, 35(68), 86–100 (in Spanish). https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.syp35-68.prsa

21. Solovyov, A.I. (2025a). Doktrinal’naja simvolizacija i politicheskoe prostorechie narrativov. Chto menjaetsja v publichnom pole? [Doctrinal symbolization and the political vernacular of narratives. What is changing in the public field?]. Polis. Politicheskie issledovanija [Polis. Political Studies], 1, 69–87 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2025.01.06

22. Solovyov, A.I. (2025b). Narratives in the area of power. The possibilities and limits of narrative politics. Politicheskaja nauka [Political Science (RU)], 2, 18–40 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.31249/poln/2025.02.01

23. Tameryan, T.Yu., & Shaipova, A.M. (2024). Politicheskij narrativ: koncepcii, tipologii i struktury [Political narrative: concepts, typologies and structures]. Aktual’nye problemy filologii i pedagogicheskoj lingvistiki [Current Issues in Philology and Pedagogical Linguistics], 1, 16–35 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.29025/2079-6021-2024-1-16-35

24. Uldanov, A.А. (2024). Politicheskie narrativy v parlamentskih debatah: podhody k analizu narrativnyh jelementov, funkcij i strategij [Policy narratives in parliamentary debates: approaches to analyzing narrative elements, functions, and strategies]. Politicheskaja nauka [Political Science (RU)], 3, 66–86 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.31249/poln/2024.03.03

25. van Dijk, T.A. (2008). Discourse and power. Palgrave Macmillan.

26. Wodak, R. (2009). The discourse of politics in action: Politics as usual. Palgrave Macmillan.

27. Zaalishvili, I.V. (2025). Political narratives in the Christmas Messages of King Felipe VI of Spain. Izvestia: Herzen University Journal of Humanities & Sciences, 218, 342–351 (in Russian).

28. Zaalishvili, I.V. (2026). Metaforicheskoye modelirovaniye obraza vraga v prezidentskom diskurse Khav’yera Mileya [Metaphorical modeling of the enemy image in the presidential discourse of Javier Milei]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta [Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin], 1(243), 43–51 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.23951/1609-624X-2026-1-43-51