Emergency Transition: Have Tertiary Language Students’ Needs Been Met?
https://doi.org/10.24833/2687-0126-2021-3-l-49-61
Abstract
The emergency transition of university education online posits a number of questions which are still to be answered. This paper aims to investigate whether language students’ needs were met when instruction was delivered completely online. To understand this, parallel questionnaires based on the current research on the needs, engagement and motivation in online and distance learning environments were administered to language instructors (N=69) and their students (N=148) at a large university in Russia. The instructors self-evaluated related competences, and the students assessed the experience of distant online language learning. The data collected via the questionnaires was subject to statistical analysis. The results showed a discrepancy in the instructors’ beliefs and students’ perceptions. The instructors were confident about their ability to meet the language learners’ needs, to provide individualisation, motivate and engage students, however, the students did not feel that happening. Open answers, which were analysed qualitatively, shed light on the reasons behind the mismatch in opinions. The students’ need for communication and interaction was inhibited by the limitations of the medium and the transactional distance. These factors contributed to the reduction of engagement, motivation and concentration. The interviews with 20 university language instructors revealed the practices the instructors implemented to meet the students’ needs, and identified the challenges they faced. Some implications for online language instructor training and development are discussed.
About the Author
S. V. Bogolepova
National Research University Higher School of Economics
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Svetlana V Bogolepova
Moscow
References
1. Alamri, H., Lowell, V., Watson, W., & Watson, S.L. (2020). Using personalized learning as an instructional approach to motivate learners in online higher education: Learner self-determination and intrinsic motivation. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 52(3), 322-352. doi: 10.1080/15391523.2020.1728449
2. Alqurashi, E. (2019). Predicting student satisfaction and perceived learning within online learning environments. Distance Education, 40(1), 133-148. doi: 10.1080/01587919.2018.1553562
3. Andrade, M.S. (2017). Online English language learning: Theory-based course design and pedagogy. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 5(3). Retrieved from: http://redfame.com/jour-nal/index.php/jets/article/view/2058/2250 (accessed: 15 March, 2021)
4. Barnett, R., & Coate, K. (2005). Engaging the curriculum in higher education. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.
5. Benson, P. (2012). Learner-centered teaching. In A. Burns & J. Richards (Eds.) The Cambridge Guide to Pedagogy and Practice in Second Language Teaching (pp. 30-37). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6. Blake, R. (2016). Technology and the four skills. Language Learning & Technology, 20 (2), 129142. Retrieved from: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/84321459.pdf (accessed: 15 March, 2021)
7. Bowden, J., Tickle, L., & Naumann, K. (2019). The four pillars of tertiary student engagement and success: a holistic measurement approach. Studies in Higher Education. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2019.1672647
8. Cole, A.W., Lennon, L., & Weber, N.L. (2019). Student perceptions of online active learning practices and online learning climate predict online course engagement. Interactive Learning Environments. doi: 10.1080/10494820.2019.1619593
9. Compton, L. (2009). Preparing language teachers to teach language online: a look at skills, roles, and responsibilities. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 22(1), 73-99. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588220802613831
10. DeCoito, I., & Richardson, T. (2018). Teachers and technology: Present practice and future directions. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 18(2). Retrieved from: https://citejournal.org/volume-18/issue-2-18/science/teachers-and-technology-present-practice-and-fu-ture-directions (accessed: 15 March, 2021)
11. Hampel, R., & Stickler, U. (2005). New skills for new classrooms: Training tutors to teach languages online. Computer AssistedLanguage Learning, 18(4).https://doi.org/10.1080/09588220500335455
12. Hsu, W.-Ch., & Liu, G.-Z. (2019). Genre-based writing instruction blended with an online writing tutorial system for the development of academic writing. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, 34(1). 100-123. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqy041
13. Jones, C.M., & Youngs, B.L. (2006). Teacher preparation for online language instruction. In P. Hubbard & M. Levy (Eds.), Teacher education in CALL (pp. 267-282). Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
14. Joosten, T., & Cusatis, R. (2020). Online Learning Readiness. American Journal of Distance Education. doi: 10.1080/08923647.2020.1726167
15. Kaufmann, R., Sellnow, D. D., & Frisby, B. N. (2016). The development and validation of the online learning climate scale (OLCS). Communication Education, 65, 307-321. doi: 10.1080/03634523.2015.1101778
16. Kaufmann, R., & Vallade, J.I. (2020). Exploring connections in the online learning environment: student perceptions of rapport, climate, and loneliness. Interactive Learning Environments. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1749670
17. Lamy, M.-N. (2013). Distance CALL Online. In M. Thomas, H. Reinders & M. Warschauer (Eds.), Contemporary Computer-Assisted Language Learning (pp. 141-158). London: Continuum.
18. Logan, G.E. (1990). Individualized foreign language instruction: American patterns for accommodating learner differences in the classroom. In H.B Altman & C.V James (Eds.) LanguageTeaching: Meeting Individual Needs (pp. 94-110). New York: Pergamon.
19. MacIntyre, PD., Gregersen, T., & Mercer, S. (2020). Language teachers’ coping strategies during the Covid-19 conversion to online teaching: Correlations with stress, wellbeing and negative emotions. System, 102352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102352
20. Mansbach, J., & Austin, A.E. (2018). Nuanced perspectives about online teaching: Mid-career and senior faculty voices reflecting on academic work in the digital age. Innovations in Higher Education, 43, 257-272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-018-9424-4
21. Martin, F., & Bolliger, D.U. (2018). Engagement matters: Student perceptions on the importance of engagement strategies in the online learning environment. Online Learning, 22(1), 205-222. doi:10.24059/olj.v22i1.1092
22. McCombs, B. (2015). Learner-centered online instruction. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 144, 57-71. doi:10.1002/tl.20163
23. Morreale, S.P., ThorpeJ., &Westwick, J.N. (2020). Online teaching: challenge oropportunity for communication education scholars? Communication Education. doi: 10.1080/03634523.2020.1811360
24. Muir, T., Milthorpe, N., Dyment, J., Freeman, E., & Hopwood, B. (2019). Chronicling engagement: students’ experience of online learning over time. Distance Education, 40(2), 262-277. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2019.1600367
25. Murphy, L.M., Shelley, M.A., White, C.J. & Baumann, U. (2011). Tutor and student perceptions of what makes an effective distance language teacher. Distance Education, 32(3), 397-419. https:// doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2011.610290
26. Nunan D. (2013). Learner-Centered English Language Education. Routledge.
27. Patricia, A. (2020). College students’ use and acceptance of emergency online learning due to COV-ID-19. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 100011. https://doi.org/10.1016Zj.ijedro.2020.100011
28. Rayens, W., & Ellis, A. (2018). Creating a Student-Centered Learning Environment Online. Journal of Statistics Education, 26(2), 92-102. https://doi.org/10.1080/10691898.2018.1475205
29. Reinders, H. (2012). Online and blended instruction. In A. Burns & J. Richards (Eds.) The Cambridge Guide to Pedagogy and Practice in Second Language Teaching (pp. 287-294). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
30. Reyes, M. R., Brackett, M. A., Rivers, S. E., White, M., & Salovey, P. (2012). Classroom emotional climate, student engagement, and academic achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(3), 700-712. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027268
31. Robinson, C.C., & Hullinger, H. (2008). New benchmarks in higher education: Student engagement in online learning. Journal of Education for Business, 84(2), 101-109. doi: 10.3200/JOEB.84.2.101-109
32. Stickler U., & Hampel R. (2015). Transforming Teaching: New Skills for Online Language Learning Spaces. In R. Hampel & U. Stickler (Eds.) Developing Online Language Teaching. New Language Learning and Teaching Environments (pp. 63-77). Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137412263_5
33. Watson, S. L., & Reigeluth, C. M. (2008). The learner-centered paradigm of education. Educational Technology, 48, 42-48.
34. Weimer, M. (2002). Learner-Centered Teaching. Jossey-Bass.
35. Hanewicz, C., Platt, A., & Arendt, A. (2017). Creating a learner-centered teaching environment using student choice in assignments. Distance Education, 38(3), 273-287. doi: 10.1080/01587919.2017.1369349
36. White, C. (2014). The distance learning of foreign languages: A research agenda. Language Teaching, 47(4), 538-553. doi:10.1017/S0261444814000196
37. Xiao, J. (2012). Tutors’ influence on distance language students’ learning motivation: Voices from learners and tutors. Distance Education, 33(3), 365-380. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2012.723167
Review
For citations:
Bogolepova S.V. Emergency Transition: Have Tertiary Language Students’ Needs Been Met? Professional Discourse & Communication. 2021;3(1):49-61. https://doi.org/10.24833/2687-0126-2021-3-l-49-61
Email this article 