«Вам здесь не рады». Иммиграция в словацком политическом дискурсе

political discourse, migration, Slovakia, threat, semantic change

1. Arcimaviciene, L. & Baglama, S. H. (2018). Migration, Metaphor and Myth in Media Representations: the Ideological Dichotomy of “Them” and “Us”. SAGE Open, 8 (2), 1-13. doi: 10.1177/2158244018768657.

2. Berelson, B. (1952). Content Analysis in Communication Research. Glencoe: Free Press.

3. Bilan, Y. (2014). About Migration of Ukraine’s Population: Scientific and Public Discourse. Transformations in Business & Economics, 13 (1), 196–208.

4. Brocková, K. (2019). Reforma Spoločného európskeho azylového systému vs. aktuálny vývoj v azylovej politike vybraných štátov Európskej únie [Reform of the Common European Asylum System vs. Current developments in the asylum policy of selected states of the European Union]. In Cibuľa, A. et al. (Ed.), Ekonomické, politické a právne otázky medzi národných vzťahov 2019 [Economic, political and legal issues of international relations 2019] (pp. 47–54). Bratislava: EKONÓM (in Slovak).

5. Cammaerts, B. (2012). The Strategic Use of Metaphors by Political and Media Elites: the 2007-11 Belgian Constitutional Crisis. International Journal of Media & Cultural Politics, 8 (2/3), 229–249.

6. Cingerová, N. (2018). Nominačné stratégie v súčasnom ruskom diskurze o emigrácii [Nomination strategies in contemporary Russian public discourse of emigration]. In Štefančík, R. (Ed.). Jazyk a politika. Na pomedzí lingvistiky a politológie III [Language and politics. Between linguistics and political science] (pp. 218–223), Bratislava: EKONÓM (in Slovak).

7. Dijk, T. A. van (1997). What is Political Discourse Analysis. Belgian Journal of Linguistics, 11 (1), 11–52. doi: 10.1075/bjl.11.03dij.

8. Dijk, T. A. van (2018). Discourse and Migration. In Zapata-Barrero, R. & Yalaz, E. (Eds.). Qualitative Research in European Migration Studies (pp. 227–245). Cham: Springer.

9. Dulebová. I. (2010). Svetová kríza a metofora v ruskom a slovenskom politickom diskurze [World crisis and metaphor in Russian and Slovak politics]. Nováfilologická revue, 2(4), 66–75 (in Slovak).

10. Dulebová, I. (2012). Politický diskurz ako object lingvistického výskumu [Political discourse as an object of linguistic research]. Jazyk a kultúra, 3 (9). Retrieved from https://www.ff.unipo.sk/jak/cislo9.html (accessed: 15 February, 2021) (in Slovak).

11. Fico, R. (2015). Problém s migrantmi treba riešiť tam, kde vzniká [The problem of migrants needs to be addressed where it arises]. Retrieved from https://www.vlada.gov.sk//robert-fico-problems-migrantmi-treba-riesit-tam-kde-vznika/ (accessed: 15 May, 2021) (in Slovak).

12. Folentová, V. (2016). SaS ide do volieb rozpoltená [SaS goes to the polls divided]. Denník N. Retrieved from<https://dennikn.sk/372555/bilbordoch-reformy-mitingoch-utecenci-sas-ide-do-volieb-rozpoltena/?ref=tit> (accessed: 15 May, 2021) (in Slovak).

13. Gbúrová, M. (2017). On the Issues of Deformation of Democracy in Slovakia after the Year 1993. In Mihálik, J. (Ed.), Annual Conference Faculty of Social Sciences UCM Trnava: Political Science and European Studies (pp. 7-18). Trnava: UCM.

14. Goodman, S. W. (2010). Integration Requirements for Integration’s Sake? Identifying, Categorising and Comparing Civic Integration Policies. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 36 (5), 753–772. doi: 10.1080/13691831003764300.

15. Grigorjanová, T. (2017). Metafora v politicko-ekonomickom diskurze [Metaphor in political-economic discourse]. In Štefančík, R. (Ed.). Jazyk a politika. Na pomedzí lingvistiky a politológie II [Language and politics. Between linguistics and political science II] (pp. 150–159). Bratislava: EKONÓM (in Slovak).

16. Krzyzanowski, M., Triandafyllidou, A. & Wodak, R. (2018). The Mediatization and the Politicization of the “Refugee Crisis” in Europe. Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies, 16 (1-2), 1-14. doi: 10.1080/15562948.2017.1353189.

17. Kucharčík, R. & Řádek, M. (2012). Politické strany a vývoj straníckeho systému na Slovensku od roku 1992 [Political parties and the development of the party system in Slovakia since 1992]. In Štrauss, D. (Ed.). Voľby 2012 [Elections 2012] (pp. 228-247). Trenčín: Transparentnosť (in Slovak) .

18. Leach, C. W. (2005). Against the Notion of a ‘New Racism’. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 15, 432–435. doi: 10.1002/casp.841.

19. Letavajová, S. & Divinský, B. (2019). Common Home Publication. Migration and development in Slovakia. Bratislava, Caritas Slovakia.

20. Liďák, J. (2016). International Migration from Asia and Africa – Issues and Challenges for Europe. Asian and African Studies, 25 (2), 231–248.

21. Matytcina, M. & Grigorjanová, T. (2018). Osobitosti prekladu politicky korektných eufemizmov [Politically correct euphemisms and their translation peculiarities]. In Štefančík, R. (Ed.). Jazyk a politika. Na pomedzí lingvistiky a politológie III [Language and politics. Between linguistics and political science III] (pp. 389–396). Bratislava: EKONÓM (in Slovak).

22. Mayring, P. (2010). Qualitative inhaltsanalyse grundlagen und techniken [Qualitative content analysis. Basics and techniques]. Weinheim and Basel: Beltz Verlag (in German).

23. Moullagaliev, N., & Khismatullina, L. (2017). Metaphors in Media Discourse on Migration. Journal of History Culture and Art Research, 6 (5), 131–138. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.7596/taksad.v6i5.1242.

24. Niehr T. (2020). Migrations diskurs [Migration discourse]. In Niehr, T., Kilian, J. & Schiewe, J. (Eds). Handbuch sprachkritik [Language criticism] (pp. 225–232). Stuttgart: J. B. Metzler (in German).

25. NR SR (2015). Meeting of the National Council of the Slovak Republic, 24 June 2015. Spoločná Česko-Slovenská Digitálna parlamentná knižnica, Archív [Czech-Slovak digital parliamentary library, Archives]. Retrieved from https://www.nrsr.sk/dl (accessed: 15 February, 2021).

26. NR SR (2018). Meeting of the National Council of the Slovak Republic, 28 November 2018. Spoločná Česko-Slovenská Digitálna parlamentná knižnica, Archív [Czech-Slovak digital parliamentary library, Archives]. Retrieved from https://www.nrsr.sk/dl (accessed: 15 February, 2021).

27. Onufrák, A. (2020). Migrácia v Európe po druhejsvetovej vojne v kontexte európskej integrácie [Migration in Europe after the Second World War in the context of European integration]. In Šutaj, Š. (Ed.). Zmenyhraníc a pohybobyvateľstva v Európe po druhej svetovej vojne [Border changes and population movements in Europe after the Second World War] (s. 40–60) Košice: UPJŠ (in Slovak).

28. Orgoňová, O. & Bohunická, A. (2016). Imigrácia ako predmet xenoslovakistiky a kritickej analýzy diskurzu na Slovensku [Immigration as a subject of xenoslovak studiesand of critical discourse analysis in Slovakia]. In Štefančík, R. (Ed.). Jazyk a politika. Na pomedzí lingvistiky a politológie [Language and politics. Between linguistics and political science] (pp. 79–93). Bratislava: EKONÓM (in Slovak).

29. Rohac, D. (2016). Vote Here for Cronyism, against Liberal Democracy. Politico, February 29, 2016. Retrieved from https://www.politico.eu/article/slovakia-election-robert-fico-visegrad-orban/ (accessed: 24 March, 2021).

30. Smolík, J. (2013). Krajněpravicové politickéstrany v zemích V4: historie a současnost [Rightwing political parties in V4 countries: history and today]. Sociológia, 45 (4), 385–410 (in Slovak).

31. Spišiaková, M. (2017). Obraznosť v jazyku politikov a v jazyku o politike [Figurativeness in the language of politicians and in the language of politics]. In Štefančík, R. (Ed.). Jazyk a politika. Na pomedzí lingvistiky a politológie II [Language and politics. Between linguistics and political science II] (pp. 171–181). Bratislava: EKONÓM (in Slovak).

32. Stojarová, V. (2019). Migration Policies of the Czech and Slovak Republics since 1989. Restrictive, Liberal, Integrative or Circular? Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, 56E, 97- 114. doi: 10.24193/tras.56E.6.

33. Sulík, R. (2015). Invázia migrantov [Migrant invasion]. Retrieved from https://sulik.sk/invazia-migrantov/?doing_wp_cron=1621155703.8401260375976562500000 (accessed: 16 May, 2021) (in Slovak).

34. Šimečka, M. M. (2017). Richard Sulík: Áno, som slovenský nacionalista [Richard Sulík: Yes, I am a Slovak nationalist]. Denník N. Retrieved from https://dennikn.sk/688253/richard-sulik-sas-som-slovensky-nacionalista-rozhovor (accessed: 15 May, 2021) (in Slovak).

35. Štefančík, R. & Hvasta, M. (2019). Jazyk pravicového extrémizmu [The language of right-wing extremism]. Bratislava: EKONÓM (in Slovak).

36. TASR (2015). So sýrskymi kresťanmi robíme pohovory a privezieme ich sem [We interview Syrian Christians and we bring them here]. Retrieved from https://www.markiza.sk/spravy/domace/1804828_kalinak-so-syrskymi-krestanmi-robime-pohovory-a-privezieme-ich-sem (accessed: 24 March, 2021) (in Slovak).

37. TASR (2016). Šéf SNS Danko: Veľké skupiny moslimov by sa u nás nemali usadiť! [SNS-Leader Danko: Large groups of muslims should not settle in our country!]. Plus 1 deň. Retrieved from http://www.pluska.sk/-spravy/z-domova/sef-sns-danko-velke-skupiny-moslimov-nas-nemali-usadit.html (accessed: 15 Mai, 2021) (in Slovak).

38. ÚHCP –Bureau of Border and Foreign Police (2020). Azyl a migrácia. Štatistika [Asylum and migration. Statistics]. Bratislava: Ministerstvo vnútra SR. Retrieved from https://www.minv.sk/?statistiky-20 (accessed: 24 March, 2021) (in Slovak).

39. Úradvlády SR (2015). Povinné kvóty naďalej odmietame, EÚ nás nemôže trestať za odlišný názor [We reject mandatory quotas; the EU cannot punish us for disagreeing]. Retrieved from https://www.vlada.gov.sk//robert-fico-povinne-kvoty-nadalej-odmietame-eu-nas-nemoze-trestat-za-odlisny-nazor/ (accessed: 24 March, 2021) (in Slovak).

40. Verschueren, Herwig (2014). Free Movement or Benefit Tourism: the Unreasonable Burden of Brey. European Journal of Migration and Law, 16 (2), 147–179. doi:10.1163/15718166-12342052.

41. Wodak, R. (2016). Politikmit der Angst. Zur Wirkung rechtspopulistischer diskurse [The Politics of fear. What right-wing populist discourses mean]. Wien, Hamburg: Edition Konturen (in German).