On Continuity and Readiness for Education: Methodology Principles of Quality-Based System Management After Helen N. Solovova
https://doi.org/10.24833/2687-0126-2021-3-4-64-72
Abstract
This paper is devoted to the analysis of the most crucial problems related to innovative trends in modern education, i.e. increasing competitiveness. The aim of this paper is twofold: a) to consider the phenomenon of current methodology of professional education in terms of international principles ISO depicted in the research works of the outstanding methodologist and educator, Professor Helen N. Solovova; b) to reveal the versatility of the scientist’s activities in the frameworks of current academic scholarship. The main methodological concept considers the global strategic processes, and the value orientations of educational activity which become especially significant for those who have to work with a personality; the latter has to understand the realia of continuing transformations of the society, qualitative and quantitative changes in the educational environment of the country and the regions, and rather ambiguous social, informational, and educational aspects of the information spaces. As a result of this study, we state that current challenges are of prior importance for the personality development as individuality. As a priority this concerns a constantly changing status of education as a whole, and the image of the university and college trainers, school educators and tutors at In-Service institutions; as is the case, these phenomena reflected in both Russian and International Scientific Scholarship help to understand the progressive methodology principles which cover Knowledge Content, Technology, and Pedagogy/Language Didactics. In conclusion, a special role, for sure, belongs to the methodology of teaching foreign languages (H.Solovova’s concept of prior significance), which performs a humanizing and cultural mission; language pedagogy and didactics are in search of novel principles and approaches to the philosophy of training and learning foreign languages as a valuable intellectual component of Russian culture and education as a whole.
About the Author
N. E. BulankinaRussian Federation
Nadezhda E. Bulankina is Dr. Sci. (Philosophy, Pedagogy), professor, Head of the Department of Foreign Languages Education
Novosibirsk
References
1. Anisimova, A.G. (2010). Metodologija perevoda angloyazychnyh terminov gumanitarnyh i obszestvenno-politicheskih nauk [Translation methodology for the Humanities and social-political terms]. Moscow: Lomonosov Moscow State University Press (in Russian).
2. Bhatia, V. (1994). Analyzing Genre: Language Use in Professional Settings. London, New York: Longman.
3. Bokova, T., Malakhova, V. (2019). Postmodernism as the dominant of education development in the information society. Retrieved from https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=41813790 (Accessed: 15 September, 2021).
4. Dalton-Puffer, C. (2007). Discourse in content and language integrated (CLIL) classrooms. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
5. Filchenko, A., Anikina Z. (2018). Linguistic and Cultural Studies: Traditions and Innovations. Proceedings of the XVIIth International Conference “Linguistic and Cultural Studies”, 11–13 October 2017, Tomsk, Russia. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 677.
6. Galskova, N. et al. (2020). Mastering Academic Communicative Skills of Master’s Students in Non-linguistic Universities: Integrative Approach. In Anikina, Z. (Eds.) Integrating Engineering Education and Humanities for Global Intercultural Perspectives. IEEHGIP 2020. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 131. Springer, Cham, 313-322. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47415-7
7. Horn, K.P. (2016). Profession, Professionalization, Professionality, Professionalism Historical and Systematic Remarks Using the Example of German Teacher Education. British Journal of Religious Education, 38(2), 130-140.
8. Kestel, M., & Korkmaz, I. (2019). The impact of modernism and postmodernism on teachers. Turquoise International Journal of Educational Research and Social Studies, 1(1), 28–33.
9. Kovaleva, M., (2020). Juvenile Frame References and Their Alterations Nature in Modern Russian Society. Siberian Teacher, 6 (133), 29-32.
10. Malakhova, N., Mishutina, O. (2021). Online vs. Offline: Axiological Model of Educational Rhizoma-Like Professional Spaces. Retrieved from https://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3scon/abs/2021/49/e3sconf_interagromash2021_12068/e3sconf_interagromash2021_12068.html (Accessed: 26.10.2021).
11. Marsh, D. (2002). Content and language integrated learning: The European dimensions — actions, trends and foresight potential. Retrieved from http://europa.eu.int/comm/education/languages/index.html (Accessed: 26.10.2021).
12. Solovova, E.N. (2009). Methods of teaching foreign languages: basic course: a manual for students of pedagogical universities and teachers. Moscow (in Russian).
13. Spratt, М. (2012). Comparing CLIL and ELT. Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) in teaching English to young learners: Conference proceedings, 11, 9-19.
14. Stoliarenko, O., Oberemok, A., Belan, T., Piasetska, N., and Shpylova, M. (2021). Shaping a Values-Based Attitude toward Human in the Context of Postmodernism via the Structural-Functional Model. Postmodern Openings, 12(3), 173-189. https://doi.org/10.18662/po/12.3/334
15. Torres-Rocha, J.C. (2019). EFL Teacher Professionalism and Identity: Between Local/Global ELT Tensions. HOW, 26(1), 153-176.
16. Yakushkina, M.S. (2020). Modernization of the system of teachers advanced training in the regional space for continuing education of adults. Siberian pedagogical Journal, 3, 17-27 (in Russian).
Review
For citations:
Bulankina N.E. On Continuity and Readiness for Education: Methodology Principles of Quality-Based System Management After Helen N. Solovova. Professional Discourse & Communication. 2021;3(4):64-72. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/2687-0126-2021-3-4-64-72