Preview

Professional Discourse & Communication

Advanced search

Nationally Orientated Communication as the Basic Function of Professional Activity in English Mass Media

https://doi.org/10.24833/2687-0126-2022-4-1-21-36

Full Text:

Abstract

This article aims to disclose the communicative essence of the English media discourse and the specificity of transmitted information which is determined by both interrelated parties (i.e. the media sources and the readers) involved in this socially valid communicative process. The English media discourse is examined in the British and American variants.

The three parts of media communication comprising the author, the addressee, and the information itself are actualized in media discourse articles in a very peculiar form of their interconnection. The media orientation towards the addressee, i.e. the British and American public, leads to the articles being not only linguistically adapted, but also thematically focused on the information which is habitual and even desirable for each of the said communities. The author often acts as a moderator who stays, figuratively speaking, behind the scene, and just regulates or verbalizes the information communicated by various representatives of the nations regarded as his/her full-fledged co-authors.

The article also considers the gender aspect of media communication where male and female issues bear their respective linguistic and thematic features.

The emotional colouring of the transmitted information turns out to be another specific point of the English media discourse that appeals to the British and American public through the use of certain linguistic means.

The authors conclude that from the national identity-related perspective English media communication may be characterized as an information field that incorporates issues of importance for both nations, renders them with the help of nationally adapted wording, and thus even forms a sort of “energy space”.

About the Authors

Yu. M. Trofimova
National Research Ogarev Mordovia State University
Russian Federation

Yulia M. Trofimova, Dr. Sci. (Philology) is professor in the English Philology Department

Saransk



M. S. Mosyagina
National Research Ogarev Mordovia State University
Russian Federation

Maria S. Mosyagina is senior lecturer in the English Philology Department

Saransk



References

1. Akimtseva, Y. V. (2019). Diskurs pressy kak vazhnyj faktor formirovaniya konceptual’noj kartiny mira britancev [Discourse of the British press as the main factor of the formation of conceptual vision of the world]. Professional Discourse & Communication, 1(3), 26-40 (in Russian). doi: https://doi.org/10.24833/2687-0126-2019-1-3-26-40

2. Vasilik, M. A. (2004). Nauka o kommunikatsii ili teoriya kommunikatsii? [The science of communication or the theory of communication?]. Aktualnye problemy teorii kommunikatsii. Sbornik nauchnykh trudov [Topical issues of the theory of communication. A collection of scientific papers]. Saint Petersburgh GPU, 4-11 (in Russian).

3. Gribovod, E. G. (2013). Mediadiskurs [Media discourse]. Diskurs Pi [Discourse pee]. 3(13), 118 (in Russian).

4. Mel’nikova, O. T. (2014). Diskursivny podkhod k issledovaniyu identichnosti [A scientific approach to the study of identity]. Vestnik Moscovskogo universiteta. Series 14. Psychologia, 1, 59-71. [Bulletin of Moscow University. Series 14. Psychology] (in Russian).

5. Morozova, O. N., Bazyleva, O. A. (2014). Opredelenie ponyatiya kommunikatsii v sovremennoy lingvistike [The definition of the notion of communication in contemporary linguistics]. Vestnik leningradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta im. A. S. Pushkina [Bulletin of A. S. Pushkin Leningrad state university], 2, 204-211 (in Russian).

6. Parygin, B. D. (1999). Anatomiya obshcheniya: Ucheb. posobie [The anatomy of communication: Student’s Book]. Saint Petersburgh (in Russian).

7. Ponomarenko, E. V. (2011). Mezhnacional’noe delovoe obshchenie: ubezhdenie ili manipuljacija? [International business communication: persuasion or manipulation?]. Problemy effektivnosti delovogo obshhenija na inostrannom jazyke: Sbornik nauchnyh dokladov [Issues of efficient business communication in foreign languages: Collection of research papers]. Moscow: MGOU, 60-64 (in Russian).

8. Cherkunova, M. V. (2019). Annotaciya kak vid maloformatnogo teksta [Abstract as a type of minitexts]. In A. A. Kharkovskaya, I. B. Krivchenko (Eds.). Maloformatnye teksty v razlichnyh tipah angloyazychnogo diskursa: sbornik nauchnyh statej [Mini-format texts in different discourse types: collected papers] (pp. 149-159), Samara: Samara University.

9. Bamberg, M., De Fina, A., & Schiffrin, D. (2011). Discourse and Identity Construction. In S. J. Schwartz, K. Luyckx, V. L. Vignoles (Eds.). Handbook of Identity Theory and Research (pp. 177-200), N. Y.: Springer.

10. Benwell, B., & Stokoe, E. (2006). Discourse and Identity. Edinburgh University Press.

11. Castells, M. (2009). The Power of Identity: The Information Age: Economy, Society, and Culture. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

12. Desyatova, O. V., & Malakhova, V. L. (2018). Linguocultural aspects in training international business specialists. INTED2018: 12th International Technology, Education and Development Conference March 5th-7th, 2018: proceedings (pp. 8476-8483), Valencia, Spain. doi: 10.21125/inted.2018.2052

13. Epstein, C. (2011). Who speaks? Discourse, the Subject and the Study of Identity in International Politics. European Journal of International Relations, 17 (2), 327-350.

14. Généreux, M., David, M. D., O’Sullivan, T. et al. (2021). Communication strategies and media discourses in the age of COVID-19: an urgent need for action. Health Promotion International, 36(4), 1178-1185. doi: 10.1093/heapro/daaa136

15. Ledeneva, S. (2018). Advertising as Specific Discourse Type: Ontology and Functional Pragmatics. 5th International Multidisciplinary Scientific Conference on Social Sciences and Arts SGEM 2018, SGEM2018 Vienna ART Conference Proceedings, 2018, vol. 5 (issue 3.1), 3-10. doi: 10.5593/sgemsocial2018H/31/S10.001

16. Nordin, S., Sturge, J., Ayoub, M. et al. (2021). The Role of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) for Older Adults’ Decision-Making Related to Health, and Health and Social Care Services in Daily Life – A Scoping Review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(1), 151. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19010151

17. Vedeneva, Y. V., Kharkovskaya, A. A., & Malakhova, V. L. (2018). Minitexts of poetic titles as markers of the English cognitive paradaigm. Training, Language and Culture, 2(2), 26-39. doi: 10.29366/2018tlc.2.2.2

18. Vreese, Claes de. (2021). Beyond the Darkness: Research on Participation in Online Media and Discourse. Media and Communication, 9 (1), 215-216. doi: 10.17645/mac.v9i1.3815

19. Zappettini, F., Ponton, D. M., & Larina T. V. (2021). Emotionalisation of contemporary media discourse: A research agenda. Russian Journal of Linguistics, 25(3), 586-610. doi: https://doi.org/10.22363/2687-0088-2021-25-3-586-610


Review

For citations:


Trofimova Yu.M., Mosyagina M.S. Nationally Orientated Communication as the Basic Function of Professional Activity in English Mass Media. Professional Discourse & Communication. 2022;4(1):21-36. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/2687-0126-2022-4-1-21-36



Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2687-0126 (Online)