Preview

Professional Discourse & Communication

Advanced search

Conceptualization of Anger in Modern Standard Arabic and English: a Comparative Study

https://doi.org/10.24833/2687-0126-2022-4-3-7-18

Full Text:

Abstract

Figurative language is part of our everyday life where meaning is communicated indirectly. Metaphor is among the major figurative devices that are commonly encountered in interactions. This study investigates the use of metaphors employed to conceptualize abstract concepts, namely that of anger in both English and Arabic. For this purpose, a corpus of metaphorical expressions denoting anger in both languages was utilized. These expressions were classified based on their metaphorical mappings and later analyzed using Kövecses’ (2002) framework. The results indicate that although the two languages share several anger conceptualizations, they have specific differences. These differences were attributed to language differences, in that language genius and vocabulary repertoire often influence the conceptualization process. Culture also proved to be another source of elements like climate and lifestyle that manipulate the conceptualization process. The study of metaphorical conceptualization of emotions in general and anger in particular in the Arabic language is a prospective topic that requires further research.

About the Author

Noureddine Derki
University of Mustapha Stambouli
Algeria

Noureddine Derki holds a PhD in English Linguistics from the University of Jordan. He currrently occupies the position of an Associate Professor at the University of Mustapha Stambouli - Mascara in Algeria. His main interst is in Discourse Analysis, Pragmatics and Translation. 



References

1. Abbasvandi, M., & Maghsoudi, M. (2013). A Contrastive Socio-pragmatic Analysis of Anger Metaphors in English and Persian. European Online Journal of Natural and Social Sciences, 2 (2), 50-58.

2. Al-Hadlaq, M., & Maalej, Z. (2012). Conceptualization of Anger in Saudi and Tunisian Arabic Dialects. In P. Wilson (Ed.). Dynamicity in Emotion Concepts (pp. 205-231), Peter Lang.

3. Al-Haq, F.-A., & Al-Sharif, A. (2018). A Comparative Study of Some Metaphorical Conceptualizations of Happiness and Anger in English and Arabic. Research Gate, November 2008. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/313173654 (accessed: 15 July, 2022).

4. Barcelona Sánchez, A. (1995). Metaphorical Models of Romantic Love in Romeo and Julliet. Journal of Pragmatics, 24 (6), 667-688.

5. Barcelona Sánchez, A., & Soriano, C. (2004). Metaphorical conceptualization in English and Spanish. European Journal of English Studies, 8(3), 295-307.

6. Csábi, S. (1999). The Conceptualization of Lust in English. Semiotische Brichte, 23 (1), 29-49.

7. Dahiru, S., & Saidu, A. (2018). Metaphorical Conceptualization of Anger in English and Fulfulde. European Journal of Literature, Language and Linguistics Studies, 2 (2), 9-21.

8. Dihna, T. (2008). English and Arabic Conceptual Metaphors of Anger: Implications for Translation. Sayyab Translation Journal.

9. Gibbs, R. (1994). The poetics of mind: Figurative thought, language, and understanding. New York: Cambridge University Press.

10. Johnson, M. (1987). The Body in the Mind: the Bodily Basis of Reason and Imagination. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

11. Katz, A. (1996). Experimental Psycholinguistics and Figurative Language: Circa 1995. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 11 (1), 17-37.

12. Kövecses, Z. (1990). Emotion Concepts. Berlin and New York: Springer Verlag.

13. Kövecses, Z. (2002). Metaphor: A Practical Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.

14. Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things. Chicago: University of Chicago.

15. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

16. Lakoff, G., & Kovecses, Z. (1987). The Cognitive Model of Anger Inherent in American English. In D. Holland & N.Quinn (Eds.). Cultural Models In Language And Thought (pp. 195-221). Cambridge University Press.

17. Ortony, A. (1975). Why Metaphors Are Necessary and Not Just Nice. Educational Theory, 25 (1), 45-53.

18. Siefring, J. (2005). Oxford Dictionary of Idioms. New York: Oxford University Press Inc.

19. Speake, J., & Simpson, J. (2008). Oxford Dictionary of Proverbs. New York: Oxford University Press Inc.


Review

For citations:


Derki N. Conceptualization of Anger in Modern Standard Arabic and English: a Comparative Study. Professional Discourse & Communication. 2022;4(3):7-18. https://doi.org/10.24833/2687-0126-2022-4-3-7-18



Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2687-0126 (Online)