Preview

Professional Discourse & Communication

Advanced search

Mockery as a tactic of destructive verbal communication in American political discourse

https://doi.org/10.24833/2687-0126-2019-1-2-60-70

Full Text:

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to analyze the communicative tactic of mockery in American political discourse. The problem of intensification of destructive elements in American political speech requires thorough investigation as political discourse becomes less conventional and more aggressive. In this context mockery is one of the general communicative tactics, which is used for humiliation and verbal assault on the speaker’s opponents. Mocking lets politicians destroy reputation of their competitors, presenting them in a negative way. Not only politicians, but also social, political and economic groups of people can become a target of mockery. The paper draws extensive empiric material to reveal that mockery is often used in pre-election discourse, because the goal of speakers in this kind of political discourse is to prevail over their opponents by all means. The communicative tactic of mockery may include destructive speech elements, e.g. invectives, negative epithets, dysphemism, pejoratives. This communicative tactic may be used along with special mimics, gestures or graphic content (caricature, video in media etc.). The analysis of empiric material proves that mockery rarely has unilateral character and frequently requires a response from the target. Users of this tactic demonstrate disrespect towards each other and try to impress and entertain their voters.

About the Author

Y. Y. Khlopotunov
Tula State Lev Tolstoy Pedagogical University
Russian Federation


References

1. ABC News. ABC News Internet Ventures. ABC News Network. (2019). Retrieved from https://abcnews.go.com/ (accessed: 26 May, 2019).

2. Baranov, A.N., & Kazakevich, E.G. (1991). Parlamentskie debaty: tradicii i novacii [Parliamentary debates: tradition and novation]. Mosow: Znanie (in Russian).

3. Billings Gazette. Lee Enterprises, Incorporated dba Billings Gazette (2019). Retrieved from https://billingsgazette.com/ (accessed: 26 May, 2019).

4. Doronina, S.V. (2009). “Nasmeshka” v zerkale obydennogo metayazykovogo soznaniya [“Mockery” in the mirror of ordinary metalinguistic consciousness]. Obydennoye metayazykovoye soznaniye: ontologicheskiye i gnoseologicheskiye aspekty [Ordinary metalinguistic consciousness: ontological and gnoseological aspects], Tomsk, TGPU, Vol. 2, 202-213 (in Russian).

5. Gornostaeva, A.A. (2018). Ironicheskie metafory v politicheskom diskurse [Ironical metaphors in political discourse]. Vestnik RUDN. Seriya: Lingvistika [Bulletin of RUDN. Ser. Liguistics], No 1, 108-125 (in Russian).

6. Issers, O.S. (2003). Kommunikativnye strategii i taktiki russkoj rechi [Communicative strategies and tactics of Russian speech]. Mosow: Еditorial URSS (in Russian).

7. Karasik, V.I. (2009). Kontseptualizatsiya nasmeshki v yazykovom soznanii [Conceptualization of mockery in the linguistic consciousness]. Yazyk. Tekst. Diskurs: nauchnyy al’manakh Stavropol’skogo otdeleniya RALK [Language. Text. Discourse: scientific almanac of the Stavropol branch of the Russian cognitive linguists association], No 10, 51-64 (in Russian).

8. Khramchenko, D.S. (2014). Konventsionalnost’ i dereglamentatsija sovremennogo anglijskogo delovogo diskursa [Conventionality and deregulation of modern businesses English discourse]. Filologitcheskije nauki. Voprosy teorii iprakriki [Philology. Issues of theory and practice], Tambov: Gramota, No 1(31), Part 1, 194-197 (in Russian).

9. Khramchenko, D.S. (2015). Planning the functional field of business English discourse: linguosynergetic approach. Voprosy prikladnoj lingvistiki [Issues of applied linguistics], No 18, 151-163.

10. Khramchenko, D.S. (2017). Confrontation in modern American political discourse: linguistic aspects & teaching practice. ICERI2017 Proceedings, 2917-2920.

11. Khramchenko, D.S. (2017). Kooperativnyj effekt pragmaticheskogo vozdejstvija v anglijskom diskurse mass-media [Cooperative effect of pragmatic impact in English discourse of mass media]. Voprosy prikladnoj lingvistiki [Issues of applied linguistics], No 3(27), 86-95 (in Russian).

12. Malakhova, V.L. (2017). Tipy frazeologicheski reprezentiruemyh konceptov v anglijskom jazyke [Types of phraseologically represented concepts in English]. Nauchnye Vedomosti BelGU. Seriya Gumaniratnye nauki [Scientific journal of Belgorod state university. Ser. Human sciences], No 7(256), Issue 33, 65-75 (in Russian).

13. Malakhova, V.L., & Desyatova, O.V. (2018). Phraseologically represented concepts as part of forming students’ linguistic consciousness. INTED2018 Proceedings: 12th International Technology, Education and Development Conference March 5th-7th, 2018, Valencia, Spain, 8468-8475.

14. Malakhova, V.L., & Smirova, K.A. (2019). The role of conceptual metaphor in formation of English discourse through the example of political texts. 6th International Multidisciplinary Scientific Conference on Social Sciences and Arts SGEM 2019. Conference Proceedings, Volume 6, Issue 2.1. Ancient Science, 359-366.

15. NBC New York. NBCUniversal Media, LLC. (2019). Retrieved from https://www.nbcnewyork.com/ (accessed: 26 May, 2019).

16. Orlova, T.A. (2017). Destruktivnye taktiki obshcheniya v konfliktnom angloyazychnom diskurse [Distructive tactics of communication in conflictual English discourse]. Kommunikaciya v sovremennom polikul’turnom mire: massovaya kommunikaciya i yazykovaya lichnost [Communication in modern multicultural world: mass communication and language identity], Moscow, Vol. 5, 35-41 (in Russian).

17. Rolling Stone. Rolling Stone, LLC. A subsidiary of Penske Business Media, LLC. (2018) . Retrieved from https://www.rollingstone.com/ (accessed: 26 May, 2019).

18. The Hill. Capitol Hill Publishing Corp. A subsidiary of news communications, INC. (2019) . Retrieved from https://thehill.com/ (accessed: 26 May, 2019).

19. The New York Times. The New York Times Company. (2019). Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/ (accessed: 26 May, 2019).

20. The Washington Free Beacon. Privately owned, for-profit online newspaper. (2019). Retrieved from https://freebeacon.com/ (accessed: 26 May, 2019).

21. The Washington Post. (1996-2019). Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com (accessed: 26 May, 2019).

22. Twitter. (2019). Retrieved from twitter.com/ (accessed: 26 May, 2019).


For citation:


Khlopotunov Y.Y. Mockery as a tactic of destructive verbal communication in American political discourse. Professional Discourse & Communication. 2019;1(2):60-70. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/2687-0126-2019-1-2-60-70



Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2687-0126 (Online)