Functions of Stereotypes in Mass Culture in the Context of Critical Multiculturalism
https://doi.org/10.24833/2687-0126-2022-4-4-10-21
Abstract
The article offers a project-based lesson of English with university students, which is aimed at studying the way stereotypes function in mass culture. Critical multiculturalism is currently gaining more and more attention among researchers, its rise is reflected in English language study books, which stands in stark contrast with the inexhaustible popularity of stereotypes in mass culture. Meanwhile, it is noteworthy that stereotypes are viewed not only as clichéd images of ethnic and socio-cultural groups, but they also participate in categorizing the flow of incoming information and thus act as an essential tool of cognition. During the preparation for the project-based lesson, students studied and analyzed the functioning of stereotypes in various samples of mass culture, including commercials and memes, and then presented the results of their research in class. With the help of their teacher the students managed to reveal the following functions of stereotypes in mass culture: cognitive, persuasive, integrative, reflexive, entertaining (including sarcastic), therapeutic function, and the function of compression. Further research may continue this list and describe the hierarchical relations between the functions.
About the Author
S. D. Kamalova
MGIMO University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Sofia D. Kamalova, Cand. Sci. (Philology) is Associate professor in the Department of the English language #3
Moscow
References
1. Baby milk advert shows girls becoming ballerinas and boys scientists. December 14, 2017. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xLfH70nm9VM (accessed: 18 November, 2022).
2. Bakhtin, M. M. (1986). Ehstetika slovesnogo tvorchestva [The aesthetics of philology]. Moscow: Iskusstvo.
3. Bhabha, H. K. (1994). The Location of Culture. London and New York: Routledge.
4. Billig, M. (2002). Henri Tajfel’s ‘Cognitive aspects of prejudice’ and the psychology of bigotry. British Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 171-188. doi:10.1348/014466602760060165
5. Clark, A. (2013). Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36, 181-253. doi:10.1017/S0140525X12000477
6. Dellar, H., & Walkley, A. (2020). Outcomes Advanced Student’s Book. National Geographic Learning.
7. Dove. Project #ShowUs. Retrieved from https://www.dove.com/us/en/stories/campaigns/ showus.html (accessed: 18 November, 2022).
8. Dummett, P., Stephenson, H., & Lansford, L. (2016). Keynote Proficient Student’s Book. Hampshire, United Kingdom: National Geographic Learning.
9. Fredrickson, B. L., & Roberts, T. (1997). Objectification theory: Toward understanding women’s lived experiences and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 173-206.
10. Grigoryan, A. A., & Grigoryan, A. Yu. (2021). Ob”ektivatsiya zhenshchiny kak odin iz vidov seksizma [Objectification of women as one of types of sexism]. Vestnik IVGU. Seriya: Gumanitarnye nauki [Ivanovo State University Bulletin], 2, 5-10. Retrieved from https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/obektivatsiya-zhenschiny-kak-odin-iz-vidov-seksizma (accessed: 17 November, 2022) (in Russian).
11. Gude, K., Duckworth, M., & Rogers, L. (2013). Cambridge English: Proficiency (CPE) Masterclass Student’s Book plus Online Skills & Language Practice. Oxford.
12. Imgflip. Scared Spongebob and Boomer Spongebob. Retrieved from https://imgflip.com/ i/406rub (accessed: 18 November, 2022).
13. Lexus Newsroom. 2013 Lexus GS – 2012 Tori 500 Campaign 002. 14 February, 2012. Retrieved from https://pressroom.lexus.com/image/2013-lexus-gs-2012-tori-500-campaign-002/ (accessed: 18 November, 2022).
14. Lippmann, W. (1922). Public Opinion. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Company.
15. McIntyre, M. (29 May, 2019). People Without Children Have No Idea What It’s Like! Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eC6eHraeMes (accessed: 18 November, 2022).
16. McLaren, P. (1994). White Terror and Oppositional Agency: Towards a Critical Multiculturalism. In D. Th. Goldberg (Ed.). Multiculturalism. A Critical Reader (45-74), Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
17. NikeWomen: What are girls made of? 16 February, 2017. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xifSHMbGSKI (accessed: 18 November, 2022).
18. Peyser, E. (13 May, 2016). Tired of Sexist Emojis? Here’s How Everything Might Change. Cosmopolitan. Retrieved from https://www.cosmopolitan.com/lifestyle/news/a58365/professional-women-emojis/ (accessed: 18 November, 2022).
19. Reshe, Zh. (24 October, 2018). Terapevticheskaya funktsiya stereotipov ili iskusstvo kak anti-terapiya [Therapeutic function of stereotypes, or arts as anti-therapy]. Street Art Museum. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G46jvYazjWI (accessed: 18 November, 2022) (in Russian).
20. Romanov, A. S. (2013). Ehtnicheskii anekdot kak sredstvo otrazheniya stereotipov ob amerikanskikh voennosluzhashchikh [Ethnic jokes as a means of reflecting stereotypes about American military men]. Vestnik RUDN, seriya Lingvistika [Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia Bulletin, Linguistics series], 3, 113-124 (in Russian).
21. Said, E. (1978). Orientalism. New York: Pantheon.
22. Sementina, V. (30 January, 2020). Pochemu seksizm v reklame ne rabotaet – infografika [Why sexism in commercials is not effective]. Mastera [Masters]. Retrieved from https://mastera.academy/sex-does-not-sell/ (accessed: 18 November, 2022) (in Russian).
23. Shchurina, Yu. V. (2014). Internet-memy: problema tipologii [Internet memes: classification]. Vestnik Cherepovetskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Cherepovetsk State University Bulletin], 6, 85-89 (in Russian).
24. Szymanski, D. M., Moffitt, L. B., & Carr, E. R. (2011). Sexual Objectification of Women: Advances to Theory and Research. The Counseling Psychologist, 39(1), 6-38.
Review
For citations:
Kamalova S.D. Functions of Stereotypes in Mass Culture in the Context of Critical Multiculturalism. Professional Discourse & Communication. 2022;4(4):10-21. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/2687-0126-2022-4-4-10-21
Email this article 