Strategies of (De)Legitimation of COVID-19 Vaccines in Tanzanian Political Speeches
https://doi.org/10.24833/2687-0126-2023-5-3-76-92
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic sparked worldwide efforts to combat the health crisis, including vaccine development and distribution. However, varying political responses to vaccination policies complicated public discourse and influenced vaccine acceptance. This research paper employs critical discourse analysis (CDA) to compare (de)legitimation strategies used in Tanzanian political speeches by two presidents: late President Magufuli and current President Samia Suluhu Hassan. The study focuses on their approaches to legitimizing or delegitimizing COVID-19 vaccines in 2021. Two speeches were purposefully selected based on their relevance to vaccination decisions. President Magufuli employed strategies such as discrediting experts, discrediting others, denial, conspiracy theories, and making accusations to delegitimize vaccines. In contrast, President Samia justified vaccine acceptance using strategies such as authorization, moral evaluation, emotional appeals, and rationalization. These differences in approach can be attributed to their respective ideologies. President Magufuli, a populist leader, displayed scepticism towards Western medicine and promoted local solutions, while President Samia presented herself as a pragmatic leader who prioritizes scientific solutions and international cooperation in addressing health crises. The findings shed light on the complexities of public health communication and vaccine acceptance in Tanzania.
About the Author
J. J. Selenya
Eastern Africa Statistical Training Centre
United Republic of Tanzania
United Republic of Tanzania
Judicate J. Selenya is an Assistant Lecturer in the Department of Official Statistics at the Eastern Africa Statistical Training Centre
Dar es Salaam
References
1. Abbas, A. H. (2020). Politicizing the pandemic : A schemata analysis of COVID-19 news in two selected newspapers. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, 35(3), 883–902. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-020-09745-2
2. Abuelwafa, M. A. (2021). Legitimation and manipulation in political speeches: a corpus based study. Procedia Computer Science, 189, 11–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.05.066
3. Al-mwzaiji, K. N. A. (2021). The political spin of conviction : A critical discourse analysis of the origin of COVID-19. Journal of Language Studies, 21(1), 239–252. https://doi.org/10.17576/gema-2021-2101-14
4. Brunkert, L., & Soest, C. von. (2023). Praising the leader : personalist legitimation strategies and the deterioration of executive constraints. Democratization, 30(3), 419–439. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2022.2150760
5. Caliendo, G. (2022). Vaccine Nationalism or ‘Brexit Dividend’? Strategies of Legitimation in the EU-UK Post-Brexit Debate on COVID-19 Vaccination Campaigns. Societies, 12(37). https://doi.org/10.3390/soc12020037
6. Chepurnaya, A. (2021). Modeling public perception in times of crisis: discursive strategies in Trump’s COVID-19 discourse. Critical Discourse Studies, 1–18.
7. Giry, J., & Gürpınar, D. (2020). Functions and uses of conspiracy theories in authoritarian regimes. In Routledge Handbook of Conspiracy Theories (pp. 317–329). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429452734-3_5
8. Hansson, S., & Page, R. (2022). Corpus-assisted analysis of legitimation strategies in government social media communication. https://doi.org/10.1177/17504813221099202
9. Harambam, J. (2021). From the unbelievable to the undeniable : Epistemological pluralism, or how conspiracy theorists legitimate their extraordinary truth claims. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 24(4), 990–1008. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549419886045
10. Monaci, S., & Persico, S. (2023). Who’s fuelling Twitter disinformation on the COVID-19 vaccination campaign? Evidence from a computational analysis of the green pass debate. Contemporary Italian Politics, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/23248823.2023.2182735
11. Mtani, F. A., & Ngohengo, J. (2023). Africa at the crossroads: An overview of the Covid-19 pandemic and its drama in Tanzania. African Journal of History and Geography, 2(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.37284/ajhg.2.1.1088
12. Pansardi, P., & Battegazzorre, F. (2018). The discursive legitimation strategies of the president of the commission: a qualitative content analysis of the State of the Union Addresses (SOTEU). Journal of European Integration, 40(7), 853–871. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2018.1482286
13. Patterson, A. S. (2022). The Tanzanian state response to COVID-19: Why low capacity, discursive legitimacy, and twilight authority matter. WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2022-34. Helsinki, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER). https://doi.org/10.35188/UNU-WIDER/2022/165-5
14. Puri, N., Coomes, E. A., Haghbayan, H., & Gunaratne, K. (2020). Social media and vaccine hesitancy : new updates for the era of COVID-19 and globalized infectious diseases. Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics, 16(11), 2586–2593. https://doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2020.1780846
15. Recuero, R., & Soares, F. B. (2022). # VACHINA : How politicians help to spread disinformation about COVID-19 vaccines. Journal of Digital Social Research, 4(1), 73–97. Retrieved from https://ualresearchonline.arts.ac.uk/id/eprint/19804/1/112-Article-Text-774-2-10-20220209.pdf (accessed: 15 May, 2023).
16. Reyes, A. (2011). Strategies of legitimization in political discourse: From words to actions. Discourse and Society, 22(6), 781–807. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926511419927
17. Rojo, L. M., & van Dijk, T. A. (1997). “There was a problem, and it was solved!”: legitimating the expulsion of ‘illegal’ migrants in Spanish parliamentary discourse. Discourse & Society, 8(4), 523–566.
18. Savoia, E., Harriman, N. W., Piltch-loeb, R., Bonetti, M., Toffolutti, V., & Testa, M. A. (2022). Exploring the association between misinformation endorsement , opinions on the government response , risk perception , and COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in the US , 10(5), 671. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines10050671
19. Van Leeuwen, T. (2007). Legitimation in discourse and communication. Discourse & Communication, 1(1), 91–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481307071986
20. Von Billerbeck, S. (2020). No action without talk? UN peacekeeping, discourse, and institutional self-legitimation. Review of International Studies, 46(4), 477–494. https://doi.org/10.1017/S026021052000011X
21. Wang, G. (2020). Legitimization strategies in China’s official media : the 2018 vaccine scandal in China. Social Semiotics, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2020.1766262
22. Wang, Y. (2022). Legitimation strategies in political rhetoric: examples from presidential speeches on Covid-19. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 12(5), 894–903. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1205.09
23. WHO. (2023). From below 10 to 51 percent Tanzania increases COVID-19 vaccination coverage. World Health Organization News website. Retrieved from https://www.afro.who.int/countries/united-republic-of-tanzania/news/below-10-51-percent-tanzania-increases-covid-19-vaccination-coverage (accessed: 15 June, 2023).
24. Wilkinson, A., & Leach, M. (2014). Briefing: Ebola – myths , realities , and structural violence. African Affairs, 114(454), 136–148. https://doi.org/10.1093/afraf/adu080
25. Wodak, R. (2021). Crisis communication and crisis management during COVID-19. Global Discourse, 11(3), 329–353. https://doi.org/10.1332/204378921X16100431230102
26. Wodak, R. (2022). Legitimizing crisis management during COVID-19. Argumentation et Analyse Du Discours, 28, 0–16. https://doi.org/10.4000/aad.6483
27. Youtube. Tanzania Broadcasting Corporation. 27 January, 2021. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xqnhFoVG48k (accessed: 10 April, 2023).
28. Youtube. Tanzania Broadcasting Corporation. 28 July, 2021. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x41khLI_YxU (accessed: 10 April, 2023).
Review
For citations:
Selenya J.J. Strategies of (De)Legitimation of COVID-19 Vaccines in Tanzanian Political Speeches. Professional Discourse & Communication. 2023;5(3):76-92. https://doi.org/10.24833/2687-0126-2023-5-3-76-92
Email this article 