Challenges in Achieving Coherence and Cohesion: A Discourse Analysis of Chinese EFL Students’ Essays
https://doi.org/10.24833/2687-0126-2024-6-1-95-108
Abstract
This paper aims to highlight the prevalent challenges faced by Hong Kong Chinese students in utilizing connectives and ensuring coherence in their English academic writing. Research indicates that constructing fluent, effective, and cohesive English written texts that maintain logical flow poses a significant challenge for Chinese learners studying English as a foreign language (EFL). This difficulty is likely attributed to the substantial cultural differences between the English and Chinese languages, regardless of the learners’ grasp of English grammar and vocabulary usage. In order to raise awareness among EFL teachers regarding the struggles Chinese students encounter in mastering connectives and cohesion in English writing, this qualitative study analyses five sample English term papers written by Hong Kong university students majoring in English in 2023. The findings reveal that the Hong Kong EFL participants tend to present their arguments in an indirect and circular manner within their English essay assignments. Additionally, due to cultural norms and politeness, the true intent of their writing is often withheld, and the thesis statement is implicitly inferred towards the end of the essay rather than being explicitly stated at the beginning in the introduction. Furthermore, a focus group interview with the student participants conducted after the written analysis demonstrated that their English academic essays reflect the influence of Chinese social interaction norms on rhetorical patterns. The relevance of this study lies in its potential to inform EFL instruction, enabling educators to better support Hong Kong Chinese students in navigating the complexities of English academic writing and to adapt pedagogical approaches that bridge cultural and linguistic gaps.
About the Author
Anna Wing Bo Tso
The Hang Seng University of Hong Kong
Hong Kong
Hong Kong
Anna Wing Bo Tso, PhD in Applied Linguistics, Department Head and Associate Professor of English, President of the Hong Kong Association for Educational Communications and Technology
References
1. Beaugrande, R., & Dressler, W. (1998). Introduction to text linguistics. London: Longman.
2. Chen, G.H., & Chung, J. (1994). The Impact of Confucianism on organizational communication. Communication Quarterly, 42(2), 93-105. doi:10.1080/01463379409369919
3. Chien, S. (2007). The role of Chinese EFL learners’ rhetorical strategy use in relation to their achievement in English writing. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 6(1), 132-150. doi: 10.3966/221880882015122101003
4. Connor, U. (2018). Intercultural rhetoric. In J.I. Liontas (Ed.), The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. doi: 10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0528
5. Dipolog-Ubanan, G. (2016). L1 influence on writing in L2 among UCSI Chinese students: A case study. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 24(4), 1841–1853.
6. Halliday, M.A.K., & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
7. Hyland, K. (2004). Disciplinary interaction: Metadiscourse in L2 postgraduate writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13, 133–151. doi: 10.1016/j.jslw.2004.02.001
8. Hyland, K. (2009). Teaching and researching writing (2nd ed.). Harlow: Pearson.
9. Ghasemi, M. (2013). An investigation into the use of cohesive devices in second language writings. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 3(9), 1615-1623. doi: 10.4304/tpls.3.9.1615-1623
10. Ji, K. (2011). The influence of Chinese rhetorical patterns on EFL writing: Learner attitudes towards this influence. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics, 34(1), 77-92. doi: 10.1558/jmbs.14572
11. Kaplan, R. (1966). Cultural thought patterns in intercultural education. Language Learning, 16(1), 1-20. doi:10.1111/j.1467-1770.1966.tb00804.x
12. Kubota, R., & Lehner, A. (2004). Toward critical contrastive rhetoric. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13(1), 7-27. doi: 10.1016/j.jslw.2004.04.0038
13. Kumaravadivelu, A. (2008). Cultural globalization and language education. New Haven, CT.: Yale University Press.
14. Li, C., & Ngai, J. (2018). Challenges and issues in academic writing: Perspectives from peer tutors. The Asian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 5(1), 104-116. https://caes.hku.hk/ajal/index.php/ajal/article/download/528/543/2052
15. Li, F., Yuan, X., & Zhang, C. (2014). Analysis of the problem of coherence in college English writing. International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 2(6), 387-390. doi: 10.11648/j.ijll.20140206.18
16. Lin, S. E., Chen L., & Chang, K. L. (2020). A comparison of the English grammatical errors of Chinese undergraduates from China and Malaysia. International Journal of Instruction, 13(1), 931-950. doi: 10.29333/iji.2020.13160a
17. Liu, M., & Wang, G. (2011). Paragraph-level errors in Chinese undergraduate EFL learners’ compositions: A cohort study. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 1(6), 584-593. doi:10.4304/TPLS.1.6.584-593
18. Moens, M. (2002). Automatic indexing and abstracting of document texts. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
19. Qi, Z., & Liu, L. (2007). Differences between reader/writer responsible languages reflected in EFL learners’ writing. Intercultural Communication Studies, 16(3), 148-159. https://web.uri.edu/iaics/files/12-Xiukun-Qi-Lida-Liu.pdf
20. Qin, C. (2017). The impact of cultural thought patterns upon English writing. Cross-cultural Communication, 1(10), 10-13. https://doi.org/10.3968/10144
21. Ramsay, G. (2000). Linearity in rhetorical organization: A comparative cross-cultural analysis of news text from the People’s Republic of China and Australia. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 10(2), 241-258. doi:10.1111/j.1473-4192.2000.tb00150.x
22. Ren, R. (2013). Different thought patterns and Chinese college English writing. In International Conference on Education Technology and Management Science (ICETMS 2013): proceedings (pp. 521-524). Atlantis Press. doi:10.2991/icetms.2013.75
23. Tso, A.W.B. (2021). Revealing obscurity: A linguistic-conceptual analysis of English academic writing by Chinese learners. Journal of Communication and Education, 5(1), 3-11. http://www.hkaect.org/jce/5(1)/Tso_2021_JCE_5(1)_pp3-11.pdf
24. Tso, A.W.B., & Ho, W.S.Y. (2017). Teaching English academic writing in the second language classroom and beyond. The Canadian Journal for Teacher Research, 5(1). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/337621836_Teaching_English_Academic_Writing_in_the_Second_Language_Classroom_and_Beyond
25. Tso, A.W.B., Ho, W.S.Y., & Chung, J.S.K. (2016). Academic Writing for Arts and Humanities Students. Singapore: McGraw-Hill Education.
26. Wang, Y., & Guo, M. (2014). A short analysis of discourse coherence. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 5(2), 460-465. doi: 10.4304/jltr.5.2.460-465
27. Tweed, R.G., & Lehman, D.R. (2002). Learning considered within a cultural context: Confucian and Socratic approaches. American Psychologist, 57(2), 89. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.57.2.89
28. Yao, S. (2014). An analysis of Chinese students’ performance in IELTS academic writing. The New English Teacher, 8(2), 102-138. http://www.assumptionjournal.au.edu/index.php/newEnglishTeacher/article/view/295/253
29. Yu, A. (2012). Analysis of the problems of the Chinese college students’ EFL classroom writings. International Education Studies, 5(5), 199-203. doi: 10.5539/ies.v5n5p199
Review
For citations:
Tso A. Challenges in Achieving Coherence and Cohesion: A Discourse Analysis of Chinese EFL Students’ Essays. Professional Discourse & Communication. 2024;6(1):95-108. https://doi.org/10.24833/2687-0126-2024-6-1-95-108
Email this article 