The Structure and Typology of Yemsa Relative Clauses: An Empirical Study
https://doi.org/10.24833/2687-0126-2024-6-2-99-120
Abstract
This study explores the internal structure of relative clauses in Yemsa, an area yet to be examined in existing literature. The research aims to address this gap by answering the following questions: What is the internal structure of the Yemsa relative clause? What kind of relative clause types occur in Yemsa, and what morphological markers are involved in the relativization process? What are the strategies in relative clause formation? What are the relativized noun phrase (NP) positions in Yemsa? Empirical data were collected through the elicitation technique through informant interviews about the structure of relative clauses in Yemsa. A descriptive approach was employed for analysis, independent of any theoretical framework. The findings reveal that headed relative clauses in Yemsa are prenominal, allowing for the relativization of subject, direct object, indirect object, oblique, and possessor NPs. The relativization strategy for the subject, direct or indirect object, is pro in situ. The oblique NP position employs a gap strategy. The relativization of possessor NP has a possessive person suffix in the possessed noun. The indicative verb is relativized in its perfective and imperfective forms. The relative verbs do not have a relativizer. The headless relative clause appears without an overt nominal head. The relativized noun phrase can be a subject, an object, or an oblique noun phrase in the headless relative clause. The role of the noun phrase within the relative clause is recoverable from the agreement suffixes attached to the relative verb. The negative relative clause is formed through the suffixation of a negative morpheme. The negative morpheme neutralizes aspects and person markers. This study contributes syntactic data to the comparative syntactic analysis of Omotic languages, enhancing our understanding of this linguistic group.
Keywords
Supporting agencies: Addis Ababa University
About the Authors
M. Asrat
Addis Ababa University
Ethiopia
Ethiopia
Mitike Asrat Demeke is a PhD candidate,
Addis Ababa.
G. Mengistu
Addis Ababa University
Ethiopia
Ethiopia
Girma Mengistu Desta, PhD, serves as an Assistant Professor of Linguistics in the Department of Linguistics and Philology,
Addis Ababa.
E. Assefa
Addis Ababa University
Ethiopia
Ethiopia
Endalew Assefa Temesgen, PhD, holds the position of Associate Professor of Linguistics in the Department of Linguistics and Philology,
Addis Ababa.
References
1. Aikhenvald, A. (2013). Possession and ownership: A cross-linguistic perspective. In A.Y. Aikhenvald & R.M.W. Dixon (Eds.), Possession and ownership: A cross-linguistic typology (pp. 1-64). Oxford University Press.
2. Aklilu Yilma, Siebert, R., & Siebert, K. (2002). Sociolinguistic Survey of the Omotic Languages Sheko and Yem. Addis Ababa, SIL International. https://www.sil.org/system/files/reapdata/16/48/33/164833328674593963481648398525054132875/SILESR2002_053.pdf
3. Aklilu Yilma. (1992). The linguistic etiquette of Yemsa. Journal of Ethiopian Studies, 25, 1-14. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41966001
4. Andrews, A.D. (1975). Studies in the syntax of relative and comparative clauses [Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology]. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. http://www.ai.mit.edu/projects/dm/theses/andrews75.pdf
5. Andrews, A.D. (2007). Relative clauses. In T. Shopen (Ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, vol. 2 (pp. 206-236). Cambridge University Press.
6. Antinuccl, F., Duranti, A., & Gebert, L. (1979). Relative clause structure, relative clause perception, and the change from SOV to SVO*. Cognition, 7, 145-176. https://www.sscnet.ucla.edu/anthro/faculty/duranti/reprints/Durantietal1979Cognition.pdf
7. Ariel, M. (1990). Accessing noun-phrase antecedents. Routledge: Taylor and Francis Group.
8. Ariel, M. (1999). Cognitive universals and linguistic conventions: The case of resumptive pronouns. Studies in Language, 23(2), 217-269.
9. Azeb Amha. (2017). The Omotic language family. In A. Y. Aikhenvald & R.M.W. Dixon (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of linguistic typology (pp. 815-853). Cambridge University Press.
10. Bender, M.L. (2000). Comparative morphology of the Omotic languages. Lincom Europa.
11. Bhat, D.N.S. (2004). Negation. In G. Booij, C. Lehmann, J. Mugdan, S. Skopeteas, & W. Kesselheim (Eds.). Morphology: An international handbook on inflection and word-formation, vol. 2 (pp. 1207-1212). Walter de Gruyter.
12. Biber, D., Conrad, S., & Leech, G. (2002). Student grammar of spoken and written English. Essex: Pearson Educations Limited.
13. Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Longman.
14. Blake, B.J. (2004a). Case. Cambridge University Press.
15. Blake, B.J. (2004b). Case. In G. Booij, C. Lehmann, J. Mugdan, S. Skopeteas, & W. Kesselheim (Eds.), Morphology: An international handbook on inflection and word-formation, vol. 2 (pp. 1037-1090). Walter de Gruyter.
16. Bresnan, J., & Grimshaw, J. (1978). The syntax of free relatives in English. Linguistic Inquiry 9(3), 331-391. https://web.stanford.edu/~bresnan/bresnan.grimshaw.LI.1978.pdf
17. Caponigro, I. (2004). The semantic contribution of wh-words and type shifts: Evidence from free relatives crosslinguistically. In R. Young (Ed.), SALT XIV 3 (pp. 8-55). Cornell University. https://journals.linguisticsociety.org/proceedings/index.php/SALT/article/view/2906/2646
18. Caponigro, I. (2020). Introducing headless relative clauses and the findings from Meso-american languages. In I. Caponigro, H. Torrence, & R.Z. Maldonado (Eds.), Headless Relative Clauses in Mesoamerican Languages (pp. 1-50). Oxford University Press. https://idiom.ucsd.edu/~ivano/Papers/2020_Caponigro_HeadlessRelativeClauses_Ch1_20-10-23.pdf
19. Castillo, C. (2003). The difference between restrictive and non-restrictive relative clauses. Atlantis 25(2), 25-38. https://www.atlantisjournal.org/old/Papers/25_2/025-038%20Castillo.pdf
20. Central Statistical Agency of Ethiopia. (2007). The 2007 Ethiopia Population and Housing Census. CSA.
21. Cinque, G. (2020). The syntax of relative clauses. A unified analysis. Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/9781108856195
22. Cinque, G. (2005). A note on verb/object order and head/relative clause order. Working Papers in Linguistics, 15, 49-104. University of Venice. https://phaidra.cab.unipd.it/detail/o:458868
23. Cinque, G. (2013). Typological studies word order and relative clauses. Routledge.
24. Comrie, B. (1989). Language universals and linguistic typology. University of Chicago Press.
25. Comrie, B. (1998). Rethinking the typology of relative clauses. Language Design, 1, 59-86. http://grammar.ucsd.edu/courses/lign236/readings/Comrie.pdf
26. Comrie, B., & Keenan, E.L. (1979). Noun phrase accessibility revisited. Language, 55(3), 649-664. https://doi.org/10.2307/413321
27. Comrie, B., & Kuteva, T. (2005). Relativization strategies. In M. Haspelmath, M.S. Dryer, D. Gil, & B. Comrie (Eds.), The world atlas of language structures (pp. 494-499). Oxford University Press.
28. Crass, J., & Meyer, R. (2008). Ethiopia. In B. Heine & D. Nurse (Eds.), Linguistic geography of Africa (pp. 228-250). Cambridge University Press.
29. De Vries, M. (2001). Patterns of relative clauses. In T.v.d. Wouden & H. Broekhuis (Eds.), Linguistics in the Netherlands, 18(1) (pp. 231-243). John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/avt.18.23vri
30. De Vries, M. (2002). The Syntax of relativization [Doctoral dissertation, University of Amsterdam]. https://www.let.rug.nl/dvries/pdf/proefschrift-mdevries.pdf
31. De Vries, M. (2006). The syntax of appositive relativization: On specifying coordination, false free relatives, and promotion. Linguistic Inquiry, 37(2), 229-270. https://pure.rug.nl/ws/portalfiles/portal/62651403/The_Syntax_of_Appositive_Relativization.pdf
32. De Vries, M. (2018). Relative clauses in syntax. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics. doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.56
33. Del Gobbo, F. (2007). On the syntax and semantics of appositive relative clauses. In N. Dehé & Y. Kavalova (Eds.), Parenticals (pp. 173-202). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
34. Derib Ado. (2004). The structure of noun phrase in Yem [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Addis Ababa University.
35. Dixon, R.M.W. (2009). The semantics of clause linking in typology perspective. In R.M.W. Dixon & A.Y. Aikhenvald (Eds.), The semantics of clause linking. A cross-linguistic typology (pp. 1-55). Oxford University Press.
36. Dixon, R.M.W. (2010). Basic Linguistic Theory. Vol. 1. Oxford University Press.
37. Doron, E. (2011). On the syntax and semantics of resumptive pronouns. In A. Rouveret (Ed.), Resumptive pronouns at the interfaces (pp. 289-318). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
38. Downing, B.T. (1978). Some universals of relative clause structure. In J.H. Greenberg, C. Ferguson, & E.A. Moravcsik (Eds.), Universals of human language. Vol. 4. Syntax (pp. 375-418). Stanford University Press.
39. Dryer, M.S. (2005a). Order of object, oblique, and verb. In M. Haspelmath, M.S. Dryer, D. Gil, & B. Comrie (Eds.), The world atlas of language structures (pp. 342-345). Oxford University Press.
40. Dryer, M.S. (2005b). Order of relative clause and noun. In M. Haspelmath, M.S. Dryer, D. Gil, & B. Comrie (Eds.), The world atlas of language structures (pp. 366-369). Oxford University Press.
41. Dryer, M.S. (2005c). Relationship between the order of object and verb and the order of relative clause and noun. In M. Haspelmath, M.S. Dryer, D. Gil, & B. Comrie (Eds.), The world atlas of language structures (pp. 390-393). Oxford University Press.
42. Fabb, N. (1990). The Difference between English restrictive and nonrestrictive relative clauses. Journal of Linguistics, 26(1), 57-77.
43. Francis, E.J., Lam, C., Zheng, C.C., Hitz, J., & Matthews, S. (2015). Resumptive pronouns, structural complexity, and the elusive distinction between grammar and performance: Evidence from Cantonese. Lingua, 126, 1-67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.lingua.2015.04.006
44. Friedmann, N., Belletti, A., & Rizzi, L. (2009). Relativized relatives: Types of intervention in the acquisition of A-bar dependencies. Lingua, 119, 67-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2008.09.002
45. Getachew Fulle. (2001). Yem. In D. Freeman & A. Pankhurst (Eds.), Living on the edge: Marginalized minorities of craftworkers and hunters in Southern Ethiopia (pp. 45-60). Addis Ababa University Press.
46. Givón, T. (1993). English grammar: A function-based introduction. John Benjamins Publishing Company.
47. Givón, T. (2001a). Syntax: An Introduction, Vol.1. John Benjamins Publishing Company.
48. Givón, T. (2001b). Syntax: An Introduction, Vol.2. John Benjamins Publishing Company.
49. Herrmann, T. (2003). Relative clauses in dialects of English: a typological approach [Doctoral dissertation]. Verlag nicht ermittelbar.
50. Herrmann, T. (2005). Relative clauses in English dialects of the British Isles. In E. C. Traugoot & B. Kortmann (Eds.), A comparative grammar of British English dialects agreement, gender, relative clauses (pp. 21-105). De Gruyter Mouton.
51. Huddleston, R. (1984). Introduction to the grammar of English. Cambridge University Press.
52. Jaeggli, O. (1984). Subject extraction and the null subject parameter. North East Linguistics Society, 14(1), 132-153.
53. Karvovskaya, L. (2018). The typology and formal semantics of adnominal possession. LOT.
54. Keenan, E.L., & Comrie, B. (1977). Noun phrase accessibility and universal grammar. Linguistic Inquiry, 8(1), 63-99.
55. Kim, J., & Sells, P. (2008). English syntax: An introduction. Center for the study of language and information.
56. Miller, J. (2002). An introduction to English syntax. Edinburgh University Press Ltd.
57. Moravcsik, E.A. (2011). Explaining language universals. In J.J. Song (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of language typology (pp. 69-89). https://uwm.edu/linguistics/wp-content/uploads/sites/214/2018/02/Moravcsik_Explaining_Universals_2011.pdf
58. Narrog, H. (2009). Varieties of instrumental. In A. Malchukov & A. Spencer (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of case (pp. 593-600). Oxford University Press.
59. Payne, T.E. (1997). Describing the morphosyntax: A guide for filed linguistics. Cambridge University Press.
60. Prince, E.F. (1990). Syntax and discourse: A look at resumptive pronouns. Proceedings of the Sixteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 16, 482-497. doi:10.3765/bls.v16i0.1719
61. Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J. (1985). A comprehensive grammar of the English language. Longman Inc.
62. Song, J. J. (2001). Linguistic typology: Morphology and syntax. Pearson Education.
63. Teshome Belayneh. (2007). The syntax of simple verbal and nominal clauses of Yem [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Addis Ababa University.
64. Tong, W. (2012). Prenominal relative clauses in Ethiopian languages: From inside and from outside. Studies in African Linguistics, 41(2), 213-252. https://doi.org/10.32473/sal.v41i2
65. Ultan, R. (1978). Toward a typology of substantival possession. In J. H. Greenberg, C. Ferguson, & E.A. Moravcsik. (Eds.), Universals of human language. Vol. 4. Syntax (pp. 11-44). Stanford University Press.
66. Van Lier, E.H. (2009). Parts of speech and dependent clauses: A typological study. LOT.
67. Van Riemsdijk, H. (2006). Free relatives. In M. Everaert & H.V. Riemsdijk (Eds.), The Blackwell companion to syntax (pp. 338-382). Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
68. Wells, R. (1963). Some neglected opportunities in descriptive linguistics. Anthropological Linguistics, 5(1), 38-49.
69. Zaugg-Coretti, S. (2013). The verbal system of Yemsa (Omotic language of Ethiopia) [Doctoral dissertation, University of Zurich]. Zurich Open Repository and Archive. https://www.zora.uzh.ch/id/eprint/87425
Review
For citations:
Asrat M., Mengistu G., Assefa E. The Structure and Typology of Yemsa Relative Clauses: An Empirical Study. Professional Discourse & Communication. 2024;6(2):99-120. https://doi.org/10.24833/2687-0126-2024-6-2-99-120
Email this article 