Professional Discourse & Communication

Advanced search

Figure in discourse

Full Text:


The article presents a broad theoretical view of figure in its expressive and semantic features, as a semiotic and cognitive category. The nature of figure comes out in speech. Figure is a characteristic form of speech sign (sign in speech). The essence of figure is described in terms of transitivity and interpretation. Both are functional qualities which serve to describe relationship between the parts of the figure. The notion parts of the figure has a double meaning: a linear and a conceptual one. Figure, to come to existence, unites and, at the same time, opposes its two parts to each other. The linear approach means a discrete and external expressive evolution of the figure, one part comes to substitute and to complete the other, this transition from one part to another implies a conceptual evolution of the figure. The linear approach applies to different scales of analysis. As figures one can see: forms of structural and nominative reduplication, transition from theme to rheme in the proposition, transition from one proposition to another within the text, intertextual transition from one text to another within the discourse. The conceptual approach goes to inner syncretism of the figure, representing the semiotic link between the sense and the semantic representation of the object in it. A linear figure turns to be a conceptual one. At this point too we see different levels of figure. An inner and an external synergies of the figure are distinguished. The first one refers to the inner correlation between two parts of the figure. The second one characterizes how the figure depends on the conceptual factors of the discourse. The figure in its evolution focuses on the “functional perspective of discourse”. The figure hones conceptual features and contributes to conceptual structuring of discourse. A conceptual figure of discourse grows in this process. The most stable conceptual features are seen in so called institutional types of discourse. The article analyses examples from political and juridical discourses. It may be of interest of different specialists working in fields of discourse, semiotics, cognition theory and logic.

About the Authors

N. V. Ivanov
MGIMO University
Russian Federation

Nikolai V. Ivanov


M. N. Fedulova
Military University of the Russian Defence Ministry
Russian Federation

Maria N. Fedulova



1. Arutyunova, N.D. (1998). Yazyk i mir tcheloveka [Language and the world of a person]. Moscow: Yazyki russkoy kultury (in Russian).

2. Barbazyuk, V.Yu. (2013). Smyslovoe razvitie metafory v textah razlichnyh janrov: semiotitcheskiy i sinergeticheskiy aspekty interpretatsii: diss. ... kand. philol. nauk[The semantic development of metaphor in texts of various genres: semiotic and synergetic aspects of interpretation (Candidate thesis)]. Military University, Moscow, Russia (in Russian).

3. Gegel, G.W.F. (1974). Entsiklopedia filosofskih nauk. T. 1. Naukalogiki [Encyclopedia of philosophy. Vol. 1. Science of logic]. Moscow: Mysl (in Russian).

4. Elmslev, L. (1960). Prolegomeny k teorii yazyka [Prolegomes to the theory of language]. Novoe v lingvistike [New in linguistics], Moscow: Izd. Inostrannoy Literatury, 1, 264-389 (in Russian).

5. Ivanov, N.V. (2018). Interpretatzia v znakovoy ontologii yazyka i v perevode [Interpretation in the sign language ontology and in translation]. Moscow: Mejdunarodnyie otnosheniya (in Russian).

6. Kurdyumov, V.A. (1999). Ideia i forma. Osnovy predikatzionnoy kontzeptzii yazyka: monografia [Idea and form. Fundamentals of the predicative concept of language: monograph]. Moscow: Military University (in Russian).

7. Kurotchkina, E.V. (2006). Propositzional’nayafigura vyrajeniya v tekstovom diskurse (na materiale angliyskogo yazyka): diss ... kand. philol. nauk [A propositional figure of expression in textual discourse (based on English) (Candidate thesis)]. Military University, Moscow, Russian (in Russian).

8. Losev, A.F. (1976). Proplema symvola i realistitcheskoye iskusstvo [Problem of symbol and realistic art]. Moscow: Iskusstvo (in Russian).

9. Permyakov, G.L. (1988). Osnovy strukturnoy paremiologii [Basics of structural paremiology]. Moscow: Nauka (in Russian).

10. Ponomarenko, E.V. (2015). Funktzional’naya perspektiva discursa kak ob’ekt lingvistiki i lingvodidaktiki [Functional perspective of discourse as an object of linguistics and linguodidactics]. Lingvostranovedeniye: metody analisa, tehnologii obutchenia. Dvenadtzatiy mejvuzovskiy seminar po lingvostranovedeniyu. Sb. statey v 2 tch. [Linguistic and regional studies: analysis methods, teaching technology. Proceedings of the 12th Interuniversity seminar on linguistic and regional studies, Moscow: MGIMO-Universitet, 1, 36-47 (in Russian).

11. Potebnya, A.A. (1990). Teoretitcheskaya poetika [Theoretical poetics]. Moscow: Vysshaya shkola (in Russian).

12. Propp, V.Ya. (2001). Morfologiya volshebnoy skazki [Morphology of a fairy tale]. Moscow: Labirint (in Russian).

13. Saussure, F. de. (1933). Kurs obshtchey lingvistiki [General linguistics course]. Moscow: Sotzekgiz (in Russian).

14. Senderovitch, S.Ya. (2008). Morfologiya zagadki [Morphology of riddle]. Moscow: Yazyki slavyanskoy kultury (in Russian).

15. Telia, V.N. (1988). Metafora kak model smysloproizvodstva i ee ekspressivno-otsenotchnaya fenktziya [Metaphor as a model of meaning production and its expressive-evaluative function]. Metafora vyazyke i tekste [Metaphor in language and text], Moscow: Nauka, 26-52 (in Russian).

16. Shklovskiy, V.B. (1983). O teorii prozy [About prose theory]. Moscow: Sovetskiy pisatel (in Russian).

17. Shnyakina, K.V. (2010). Diskursivnaya dinamika obraznykh form v yazyke i tekste (semiotitcheskiy analis angliyskikh i russkikh poslovitz i metaphor): diss. ... kand. philol. nauk [The discursive dynamics of figurative forms in language and text (semiotic analysis of English and Russian proverbs and metaphors) (Candidate thesis)]. Military University, Moscow, Russia (in Russian).

For citation:

Ivanov N.V., Fedulova M.N. Figure in discourse. Professional Discourse & Communication. 2019;1(3):9-25. (In Russ.)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

ISSN 2687-0126 (Online)