Preview

Professional Discourse & Communication

Advanced search

Cross-Cultural Research: Methodological Challenges in Translating Meanings and Cultural Codes

https://doi.org/10.24833/2687-0126-2025-7-4-10-37

Abstract

Researchers in anthropology and psychology conducting cross-cultural comparative studies face a range of complex methodological challenges which significantly impact the validity and reliability of their findings. Paramount among these are issues related to the accurate translation of culturally specific concepts across diverse linguistic frameworks, as well as the difficulties associated with what Thomas Hylland Eriksen termed the “translation of non-verbal acts.” The objective of this study is to analyze methodological approaches aimed at optimizing intercultural professional discourse, focusing on the precision of specialized terminology translation and the effective interpretation of non-verbal communication. This article delineates the historical trajectory of these methodological concerns, beginning with contributions from evolutionary anthropologists and progressing through to contemporary large-scale cross-cultural research initiatives. The primary methodological challenges can be categorized into three interrelated areas: (1) the semantically and contextually adequate translation of cultural concepts, which necessitates nuanced interpretative frameworks; (2) the mitigation of ethnocentric biases that may distort data interpretation; and (3) the contextualization of findings within indigenous cultural norms rather than the imposition of universal standards rooted in Western paradigms. Current advancements in cross-cultural psychology and anthropology increasingly emphasize research conducted in nonWestern societies, highlighting cultural variability and establishing new benchmarks for assessing the cross-cultural validity of data. This article draws upon the authors’ ethnographic research and presents specific case studies, including a large-scale international project on COVID-19 involving respondents from 23 countries, to illustrate methodological obstacles and explore potential solutions, such as back-translation techniques. Additionally, the authors examine how globalization influences linguistic and cultural boundaries – often eroding traditional distinctions and resulting in homogenization – while simultaneously fostering a heightened awareness and assertion of local cultural identity. Thus, this synthesis aims to contribute to ongoing scholarly discourse by proposing refined strategies for enhancing cross-cultural research rigor, with particular attention to linguistic translation, interpretative bias mitigation, and culturally sensitive analytical paradigms.

About the Authors

V. N. Burkova
Center for Cross-Cultural Psychology and Human Ethology, Institute of Ethnology and Anthropology, Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

Valentina N. Burkova, Cand. Sci. (History), is a Senior Researcher

Moscow



M. L. Butovskaya
Center for Cross-Cultural Psychology and Human Ethology, Institute of Ethnology and Anthropology, Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

Marina L. Butovskaya, D. Sci. (History), is a Corresponding Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Professor, and Head of the Center for Cross-Cultural Psychology and Human Ethology

Moscow



N. Yu. Simakov
MGIMO University
Russian Federation

Nikolay Yu. Simakov, Cand. Sci. (Biology), is a Senior Lecturer

Moscow



References

1. Berry, J.W. (1969). On cross-cultural comparability. International Journal of Psychology, 4(2), 119–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207596908247261

2. Berry, J.W., Poortinga, Y.H., Segall, M.H., & Dasen, P.R. (2007). Kross-kul’turnaya psik­hologiya. Issledovanie i primenenie [Cross-cultural psychology: Research and applications]. Khark­ov: Gumanitarnyy Tsentr (in Russian).

3. Brislin, R. (1973). Questionnaire wording and translation. In Cross-Cultural Research Meth­ods (pp. 32–58). John Wiley & Sons.

4. Burkova, V.N. (2023). K voprosu o slozhnostyakh kross-kul’turnykh issledovanii: opyt raboty po proektu COVID-19 [Towards the Challenges of Cross-Cultural Research: Experience on COV­ID-19 Project]. Journal of Frontier Studies, 8(2), 352-373 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.46539/jfs.v8i2.464

5. Burkova, V.N., & Butovskaya, M.L. (Eds.). (2022). COVID-19 i povedenie cheloveka: stress, mify i sotsial’naya real’nost’: kollektivnaya monografiya [COVID-19 and human behavior: Stress, myths, and social reality: Collective monograph]. Moscow & St-Petersburg: Nestor-Istoriya (in Rus­ sian).

6. Burkova, V.N., Butovskaya, M.L., & Simakov, N.Yu. (2022a). Empatiya i vzaimopomoshch do i vo vremya COVID-19 (dannye po moskovskim studentam) [Empathy and cooperation until and during COVID-19 (based on research of Moscow students)]. Voprosy psykhologii, 68(1), 28–40 (in Russian).

7. Burkova, V.N., Butovskaya, M.L., Ermakov, A.M., Galimkhanov, A.B., Egorova, A.I., Zinuro­ va, R.I., Kalinichenko, O.V., Koltun, G.G., Konieva, O.N., Mantatova, N.V., Mashtykov, S.S., Mi­ laeva, T.V., & Spodina, V.I. (2025). Predstavleniya studentov ob ottsovskom vklade (dannye po 10 regionam Rossii) [Students’ perceptions of paternal investments (data from 10 regions of Russia). Sibirskie istoricheskie issledovaniia – Siberian Historical Research, 2, 224–249 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.17223/2312461X/48/11

8. Burkova, V.N., Butovskaya, M.L., Fedenok, Y.N., Ermakov, A.M., Kolodkin, V.A., Spodi­ na, V.I., & Zinurova, R.I. (2022b). Trevozhnost’ i agressiya vo vremya COVID-19: Na primere che­ tyrekh regionov Rossii [Anxiety and aggression during COVID-19: on example of four regions of Russia]. Sibirskie istoricheskie issledovaniia – Siberian Historical Research, 2, 132–158 (in Russian). doi:10.17223/2312461X/36/8

9. Burkova, V.N., Butovskaya, M.L., Randall, A.K., Fedenok, J.N., Ahmadi, K., Alghraibeh, A.M., Allami, F.B.M., Alpaslan, F.S., Al-Zu’bi, M.A.A., Biger, D.F., Cetinkaya, H., David, O.A., Donato, S., Dural, S., Erickson, P., Ermakov, A.M., Ertugrul, B., Fayankinnu, E.A., Fisher, M.L., ... Zinurova, R.I. (2021c). Predictors of anxiety in the COVID-19 pandemic from a global perspective: Data from 23 countries. Sustainability, 13(7), 4017. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13074017

10. Burkova, V.N., Butovskaya, M.L., Randall, A.K., Fedenok, J.N., Ahmadi, K., Alghraibeh, A.M., Allami, F.B.M., Alpaslan, F.S., Al-Zu’bi, M.A.A., Biger, D.F., Cetinkaya, H., David, O.A., Donato, S., Dural, S., Erickson, P., Ermakov, A.M., Ertugrul, B., Fayankinnu, E.A., Fisher, M.L., … Zinurova, R.I. (2022). Factors associated with highest symptoms of anxiety during COVID-19: Cross-cultural study of 23 countries. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 805586. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.805586

11. Butovskaya, M. L., Burkova, V. N., Randall, A. K., Donato, S., Fedenok, J. N., Hocker, L., Kline, K. M., Ahmadi, K., Alghraibeh, A. M., Allami, F. B. M., Alpaslan, F. S., Al-Zu’bi, M. A. A., Biçer, D. F., Cetinkaya, H., David, O. A., Dural, S., Erickson, P., Ermakov, A. M., Ertugrul, B., ... Zinurova, R. I. (2021b). Cross-cultural perspectives on the role of empathy during COVID-19’s first wave. Sustainability, 13(13), 7431. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13137431

12. Butovskaya, M., Burkova, V., Apalkova, Y., Dronova, D., Rostovtseva, V., Karelin, D., Mkrtch­ yan, R., Negasheva, M., & Batsevich, V. (2021a). Sex, population origin, age and average digit length as predictors of digit ratio in three large world populations. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 8157. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-87394-6

13. Butovskaya, M., Burkova, V., Karelin, D., & Filatova, V. (2019). The association between 2D:4D ratio and aggression in children and adolescents: Cross-cultural and gender differences. Early Human Development, 137, 104823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2019.07.006

14. Butovskaya, M.L., Burkova, V.N., & Karelin, D.V. (2020). Does friendship matter? Sharing, fairness and parochial altruism in African children and adolescents. Social Evolution & History, 19(1), 89-112. https://doi.org/10.30884/seh/2020.01.05

15. Coetzee, V., Greeff, J.M., Stephen, I.D., & Perrett, D.I. (2014). Cross-cultural agreement in facial attractiveness preferences: The role of ethnicity and gender. PLoS One, 9(7), e99629. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0099629

16. Eriksen, T.H. (2004). What is anthropology? London: Pluto Press.

17. Fink, B., Andre, S., Mines, J.S., Weege, B., Shackelford, T.K., & Butovskaya, M. (2016a). Sex difference in attractiveness perceptions of strong and weak male walkers. American Journal of Human Biology, 28(6), 913–917. doi:10.1002/ajhb.22891

18. Fink, B., Butovskaya, M., Sorokowski, P., Sorokowska, A., & Matts, P.J. (2017a). Visual per­ ception of British women’s skin color distribution in two non-industrialized societies, the Maasai and the Tsimane. Evolutionary Psychology, 15(3), 1474704917718957. doi:10.1177/1474704917718957

19. Fink, B., Butovskaya, M.L., & Shackelford, T.K. (2019). Assessment of physical strength from gait: Data from the Maasai of Tanzania. Biology Letters, 15(3), 20180803. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2018.0803

20. Fink, B., Hufschmidt, C., Hirn, T., Will, S., McKelvey, G., & Lankhof, J. (2016b). Age, health and attractiveness perception of virtual (rendered) human hair. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1893. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01893

21. Fink, B., Neave, N., Brewer, G., & Pawlowski, B. (2007). Variable preferences for sexual di­ morphism in stature (SDS): Further evidence for an adjustment in relation to own height. Personality and Individual Differences, 43(8), 2249–2257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2007.07.014

22. Fink, B., Wübker, M., Ostner, J., Butovskaya, M.L., Mezentseva, A., Muñoz-Reyes, J.A., Sela, Y., & Shackelford, T.K. (2017b). Cross-cultural investigation of male gait perception in relation to phys­ ical strength and speed. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1427. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01427

23. Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. New York, NY: Basic Books.

24. Goldschmidt, W. (1966). Comparative functionalism. Berkeley: University of California Press. https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520321649

25. Hambleton, R.K., Yu, L., & Slater, S.C. (1999). Field test of ITC guidelines for adapting psychological tests. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 15(3), 270–276. https://doi.org/10.1027//1015-5759.15.3.270

26. Harris, M., Consorte, J.G., Lang, J., & Byrne, B. (1993). Who are the whites? Imposed census categories and the racial demography of Brazil. Social Forces, 72(2), 451-462. https://doi.org/10.2307/2579856

27. Hippocrates. (1936). Izbrannye knigi [Selected books] (V.I. Rudnev, Trans.; V.P. Karpov, Ed.). Moscow: Gosudarstvennoe izdatel’stvo biologicheskoi i meditsinskoi literatury [Classics of biology and medicine series] (in Russian).

28. Javaras, K.N., & Ripley, B.D. (2007). An “unfolding” latent variable model for Likert attitude data: Drawing inferences adjusted for response style. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 102(478), 454–463. https://doi.org/10.1198/016214506000000960

29. Johnson, T.R. (2003). On the use of heterogeneous thresholds ordinal regression models to ac­ count for individual differences in response style. Psychometrika, 68, 563-583. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02295612

30. Jones, P S., Lee, J.W., Phillips, L.R., Zhang, X.E., & Jaceldo, K.B. (2001). An adaptation of Brislin’s translation model for cross-cultural research. Nursing Research, 50(5), 300–304. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-200109000-00008

31. Kline, R.B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

32. Kluckhohn, C. (1953). Universal categories of culture. In A.L. Kroeber (Ed.), Anthropology today (pp. 507–523). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

33. Lévi-Strauss, C. (2016). Uznavat’ drugikh. Antropologiya i problemy sovremennosti [To rec­ ognize others. Anthropology and problems of modernity] (E. Chebuchina, Trans.). Moscow: Tekst (in Russian).

34. Losev, A.F., & Taho-Godi, A.A. (2005). Platon. Aristotel’. 3-e izd., ispr. i dop. [Plato. Aristotle (3rd ed.)]. Moscow: Molodaya gvardiia (in Russian).

35. Malinowski, B. (2015). Izbrannoe: Argonavty zapadnoy chasti Tikhogo okeana [Selected works: The Argonauts of the Western Pacific]. Moskow & St. Petersburg: Tsentr gumanitarnykh inici­ ativ [Centre of Humanitarian Initiatives] (in Russian).

36. Matts, P.J., & Fink, B. (2010). Chronic sun damage and the perception of age, health and attractiveness. Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences, 9, 421–431. https://doi.org/10.1039/B9P­P00166B

37. Matts, P.J., Fink, B., Grammer, K., & Burquest, M. (2007). Color homogeneity and visual perception of age, health and attractiveness of female facial skin. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 57(6), 977–984. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2007.07.040

38. Pawlowski, B. (2003). Variable preferences for sexual dimorphism in height as a strategy for increasing the pool of potential partners in humans. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 270(1516), 709–712. doi:10.1098/rspb.2002.2294

39. Popov, V.A. (Ed.). (2012). Algebra rodstva: Rodstvo. Sistemy rodstva. Sistemy terminov rod­ stva [Algebra of kinship: Kinship. Kinship systems. Kinship term systems]. St-Petersburg: Peter the Great Museum of Anthropology and Ethnography of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Issue 13 (in Russian).

40. Radcliffe-Brown, A.R. (1913). Three tribes of Western Australia. London: Royal Anthropolog­ ical Institute of Great Britain and Ireland.

41. Semenova, O.V., Burkova, V.N., Butovskaya, M.L., Ermakov, A.M., Kasparova, E.N., Ka­ linichenko, O.V., & Stoyanova, S. (2025). Male and female roles in the perception of young people among Belarusians, Bulgarians, and Russians. Journal of Frontier Studies, 10(1), 120–149 (in Rus­ sian). https://doi.org/10.46539/jfs.v10i1.607

42. Sorokowska, A., Pellegrino, R., Butovskaya, M., Marczak, M., Niemczyk, A., Huanca, T., & Sorokowski, P. (2017). Dietary customs and food availability shape the preferences for basic tastes: A cross-cultural study among Polish, Tsimane’, and Hadza societies. Appetite, 116, 291–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2017.05.015

43. Sorokowski, P., & Butovskaya, M. L. (2012). Height preferences in humans may not be universal: Evidence from the Datoga people of Tanzania. Body Image, 9(4), 510–516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2012.07.002

44. Sorokowski, P., & Pawlowski, B. (2008). Adaptive preferences for leg length in a poten­ tial partner. Evolution and Human Behavior, 29(2), 86–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbe­hav.2007.09.002

45. Sorokowski, P., Sorokowska, A., Butovskaya, M., Stulp, G., Huanca, T., & Fink, B. (2015). Body height preferences and actual dimorphism in stature between partners in two nonwestern societies (Hadza and Tsimane’). Evolutionary Psychology, 13(2), 455-469. doi:10.1177/147470491501300209

46. Sorokowski, P., Szmajke, A., Sorokowska, A., Borg Cunen, M., Fabrykant, M., Zarafshani, K., ... & Fang, T. (2011). Attractiveness of leg length: Report from 27 nations. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 42(1), 131–139. doi:10.1177/0022022110392229

47. Sperber, A.D. (2004). Translation and validation of study instruments for cross-cultural re­ search. Gastroenterology, 126, S124–128. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2003.10.016

48. Stephen, I.D., Scott, I.M., Coetzee, V., Pound, N., Perrett, D.I., & Penton-Voak, I.S. (2012). Cross-cultural effects of color, but not morphological masculinity, on perceived attractiveness of men’s faces. Evolution and Human Behavior, 33(4), 260–267. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2011.10.003

49. Stulp, G., Buunk, A. P., Pollet, T. V., Nettle, D., & Verhulst, S. (2013). Are human mating preferences with respect to height reflected in actual pairings? PLoS One, 8, e54186. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0054186

50. Swami, V., Einon, D., & Furnham, A. (2006). The leg-to-body ratio as a human aesthetic cri­ terion. Body Image, 3(4), 317–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2006.08.003

51. Swami, V., Rozmus-Wrzesinska, M., Pawłowski, B., Voracek, M., Haubner, T., Danel, D., ... Furnham, A. (2008). The influence of skin tone, body weight, and hair color on perceptions of wom­ en’s attractiveness and health: A cross-cultural investigation. Journal of Cultural and Evolutionary Psychology, 6(4), 321–341. doi:10.1556/JEP.6.2008.4.4

52. Telles, E.E. (2002). Racial ambiguity among the Brazilian population. Ethnic and Racial Stud­ ies, 25(3), 415–441. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870252932133

53. Van de Vijver, F.J.R., & Leung, K. (1997). Methods and data analysis for cross-cultural re­ search. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.


Review

For citations:


Burkova V.N., Butovskaya M.L., Simakov N.Yu. Cross-Cultural Research: Methodological Challenges in Translating Meanings and Cultural Codes. Professional Discourse & Communication. 2025;7(4):10-37. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/2687-0126-2025-7-4-10-37



Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2687-0126 (Online)