“University Lecturers Are Not Casual Labourers”: Stance and Discursive Framing of the 2022 ASUU-FGn Industrial Conflict in TV Interviews

Nigeria’s university system has been plagued by recurring industrial actions arising from conflicts of interest between the Academic Staff Union of Universities (ASUU) and the Federal Government of Nigeria (FGN), with the 2022 strike constituting the longest such action in the country’s history. The ASUU–FGN tussle has been explored in linguistics, but empirical work has relatively neglected a new and essential dataset—live TV interviews—in which strategic discursive frames that foreground the projected stances of spokespersons for the opposing camps are used in real-time, high-stakes, and mediatised interactions. Focusing on the 2022 impasse, this study examines how key social actors construct their stances and take ideological positions within specific discursive frames. Martin and White’s appraisal framework and Van Dijk’s socio-cognitive model of critical discourse analysis constitute the study’s theoretical framework. Using a qualitative analytical approach, the authors subject data comprising transcribed interactions from four TV interviews, featuring a key social actor from each camp, to discourse analysis. The findings show that social actors project their stances within the following discursive and argumentative frames: the constitutional/legal basis of the industrial action; the exploitation of ideologies of welfarism and inclusivity; the (de)valuation of Nigerian tertiary education; and the politicisation of the industrial action. These discursive frames are supported by appraisal subsystems (attitude and engagement) and representational strategies, including authority, polarisation, categorisation, actor description, comparison, lexicalisation, and populism, which enable favourable or derogatory representations of both groups’ actions. The study observes that, during TV interviews, social actors debate the industrial conflict primarily to legitimise and justify their actions rather than to propose effective mechanisms for conflict resolution. It also finds that discursive moves and stance expressions indicate greater confrontation and less diplomacy. The study provides insights into identity politics and the underlying complexities responsible for the persistently strained relationship between ASUU and the FGN.

1. Abada, I. M., Odey, C. O., & Odey, M. O. (2023). Federal government–ASUU dispute over university autonomy and industrial disharmony in federal universities in Nigeria, 2009–2023. Qeios, 1(7). https://doi.org/10.32388/OB0CYM

2. Adarviele, J. A. (2015). Implication of incessant strike actions on technical education programmes in Nigeria. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(8), 23–40.

3. Adeyemo, J. A., & Elegbe, O. (2021). Newspaper framing of industrial crises between the Academic Staff Union of Universities and the Federal Government of Nigeria. Media and Communication Review, 6(1), 1–19.

4. Agbam, W. E., Okocha, D. O., & Tartsea-Anshase, M. (2022). Perception of University of Abuja academics on the use of dialogue in managing ASUU-Federal Government impasse. African Journal of Culture, Communication and Media, 2(1), 258–273.

5. Agomuo, Z. (2022, August 27). From education, medical to political tourism—sad story of Nigerian politicians. Business Day. https://businessday.ng/politics/article/from-education-medical-to-political-tourism-sad-story-of-nigerian-politicians/

6. Aidelunuoghene, O. S. (2014). ASUU industrial actions: Between ASUU and government—is it an issue of rightness? Journal of Education and Practice, 5(6), 7–17.

7. Ajiboye, E. (2017). Stance-taking in Nigerian digital communities: A critical discourse analysis of citizens’ engagements on Biafra agitations [Doctoral dissertation, Covenant University].

8. Akah, A. U. (2018). ASUU strike: The Federal Government and Nigerian educational system. International Journal of Educational Research, 6(5), 19–32.

9. Akano, R. (2023). Stancetaking and discourse representation of the Yoruba nation agitation in Nigerian digital communities [Master’s thesis, University of Ibadan].

10. Akinwotu, S. A. (2019). The role of discursive constructions in Nigeria’s ASUU-FGN labour conflict of 2013. The African Journal of Information and Communication, 23, 1–18.

11. Aragbuwa, A. (2014). The pragmatics of language use in industrial dispute: A study of the 2013 ASUU/FGN face-off. In R. O. Atoye (Ed.), Papers in linguistics (Vol. 15, pp. 1–21). Taylor and Francis.

12. Awoniyi, F., Afolabi, I., & Akano, R. (2024). Rhetorical and ideological strategies in campaign jingles on Osun 2022 gubernatorial election. ALTRALANG Journal, 6(1), 361–374.

13. Blommaert, J., & Bulcaen, C. (2000). Critical discourse analysis. Annual Review of Anthropology, 29(1), 447–466.

14. Chigozie, U. B. (2017). An assessment of the impact of Academic Staff Union of Universities (ASUU) on human resource development in Nigerian universities. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Services, 7(4), 740-747.

15. Chukwudi, E. C., & Idowu, S. S. (2021). ASUU strike and the Nigerian governments: Implications on students and society in a changing world. South Asian Journal of Social Studies and Economics, 294–304.

16. Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. L. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.

17. Creswell, J. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.). Sage.

18. Edema, G., & Tolu-Kolawole, D. (2022, May 16). No agreement with FG, strike not ending soon – ASUU, SSANU, NASU. Punch. https://punchng.com/no-agreement-with-fg-strike-notending-soon-asuu-ssanu-nasu/

19. Egwu, S. (2016). Why workers do not perform. African Journal of Management Sciences, 2(2), 40–48.

20. Ellah, S. M. (2014). The language of industrial actions in Nigeria. Research on Humanities and Social Sciences, 4(7), 176–184.

21. Ezirim, C. (2023). Legitimisation of language in 2022 ASUU vs FGN impasse. Scholars International Journal of Linguistics and Literature, 6(7), 266–271.

22. Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing discourse: Textual analysis of social research (Rev. ed.). Routledge.

23. Ganiyu, M. A., Adefemi, V. O., & Ismail, O. A. (2021). Social media deployment for public relations campaign: A study of Nigerian public relations professionals. Social & Digital Media Discourse, 2(1), 81–90.

24. Haaga, P. T., & Sasa, M. S. (2019). A philosophical reflection on the nature and relevance of Azikiwe’s political ideology of neo welfarism. International Journal of Humanities and Innovation (IJHI), 2(4), 152–157.

25. Haddington, P. (2004). Stance taking in news interviews. Finnish Journal of Linguistics, 17, 101–142.

26. Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar (2nd ed.). Edward Arnold.

27. Hassan, N. A., Manu, H., & Ahmed, M. (2023). The impact of IPPIS policy on the university system: A critical assessment. Kashere Journal of Politics and International Relations, 1(1), 1–6.

28. Julius, A. (2021). Labour and agitation discourse: Media text analysis of industrial crisis in public universities in Nigeria. International Journal of Current Research in the Humanities, 25(1), 241–258.

29. Martin, J. R. (2000). Beyond exchange: Appraisal systems in English. In S. Hunston & G. Thompson (Eds.), Evaluation in text (pp. 142–175). Oxford University Press.

30. Martin, J. R., & White, P. R. R. (2005). The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. Palgrave Macmillan.

31. Nein, G., & Peter, T. O. (2024). ASUU-Federal Government (FG) disputes and its impact on university education in Nigeria. International Journal of Economics Commerce and Management, 12(1), 210–221.

32. Nein, G., et al. (2023). Academic Staff Union of Universities (ASUU) and Federal Government (FGN) industrial disputes and its effects on university education in Nigeria. Port Harcourt Journal of Educational Studies (PHAJOES), 8(1), 54–61.

33. Njoku, M. E., & Igbokwe, C. N. (2024). Ongoing conflict between Federal Government of Nigeria and Academic Union of Universities: Implication for global educational competitiveness and relevance. Nigerian Journal of Educational Philosophy, 32(1), 1–9.

34. Nsungo, D. P., & Orabueze, F. O. (2022). Discursive constructions of power in selected Nigerian media reports of Academic Staff Union of Universities (ASUU) strikes. International Journal of Innovative Research and Development, 11(9), 34–47.

35. Nwabughiogu, L. (2022, March 3). Reps reject bills seeking to stop children of public officers from schooling abroad. Vanguard. https://www.vanguardngr.com/2022/03/reps-reject-bills-seeking-to-stop-children-of-public-officers-from-schooling-abroad/

36. Nwanyanwu, D. H., et al. (2023). The impact of Academic Staff Union of Universities’ strikes on Nigerian students. International Journal of Innovative Research in Education, 10(1), 110–122.

37. Ogundeji, A. O., & Uduk, H. (2024). Discourse strategies for discourse representations of ASUU-FGN impasse in Nigerian newspapers. Scholars International Journal of Linguistics and Literature, 7(10), 279–287.

38. Okebukola, F. O. (2010). Staff unions, conflicts and conflict resolution in tertiary institutions in Nigeria [Paper presentation]. 1st National Conference of the Colleges of Education Academic Staff Union (COEASU), Tai Solarin College of Education, Omu-Ijebu, Ogun State.

39. Oladejo, S., & Ijimayowa, T. C. (2022). ASUU strike in Nigerian universities. Journal of Education Society and Multiculturalism, 6, 87–103.

40. Osuagwu, S., & Chukwuemeka, E. (2024). Labour conflict and management of federal universities in Nigeria: A study of the Academic Staff Union of Universities (ASUU). Journal of Policy and Development Studies, 16(1), 309–328.

41. Oteíza, T. (2017). The appraisal framework and discourse analysis. In T. Bartlett & G. O’Grady (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of systemic functional linguistics (pp. 481–496). Routledge.

42. Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

43. Reisigl, M., & Wodak, R. (2009). The discourse-historical approach. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (2nd ed., pp. 87–121). Sage.

44. Toryuha, A. T. (2024). Stakeholders’ perception of causes and consequences of ASUU strike among public universities in Nigeria: 1999–2022. Polish Political Science Yearbook, 53(3), 193–205.

45. Uduk, H. E., & Ogundeji, A. (2024). A semantic analysis of discourse representations of ASUU-FGN impasses in Nigerian newspapers. International Journal of Arts and Humanities, 2(2), 24–38.

46. Ugwona, C. N. (2016). 2013 ASUU strike discourses in Nigeria: A critical discourse analysis. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 7(2), 435–444.

47. Van Dijk, T. A. (1998). Ideology: A multidisciplinary approach.

48. Van Dijk, T. A. (2006). Politics, ideology and discourse. https://discourses.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/Teun-A.-van-Dijk-2006-Politics-ideology-discourse.pdf

49. White, P. R. (2000). Dialogue and inter-subjectivity: Reinterpreting the semantics of modality and hedging. In M. Coulthard, J. Cotterill, & F. Rock (Eds.), Dialogue analysis VII (pp. 67–80). Niemeyer.