Terminological Field Structure as а Reflection of Legal Institutions in English-Russian Legal Terminology

Institutional asymmetry of legal terms is not uniform but graduated: the divergence between a term and its translation equivalent is located at different levels, from the status of an individual unit to the structure of an entire terminological field. The present study aims to demonstrate that the structure of a terminological field reproduces the structure of the legal institution it serves, determining the level at which the translation equivalent ceases to be reliable. Drawing on four illustrative cases arranged by an increasing degree of divergence – from the status of an institution (magistrate) through categorical classification (felony / misdemeanour) and the type of legal remedy (injunction) to the structure of the field (the English series of names for a legal practitioner against the single Russian advokat) – the article identifies a scale on which the function of a term and its equivalent may coincide, creating an illusion of equivalence, while the actual divergence lies in the institutional structure. The analysis combines dictionary, statutory, and corpus data (the British National Corpus) with authentic court judgments. Corpus data are used to independently verify dictionary and statutory observations by establishing absolute frequencies and building collocation profiles for the core terms. Based on the analysis, a typology of four levels of asymmetry is constructed. The practical value of the results is twofold: for translation, they indicate when a functional equivalent suffices and when an institutional note is required; for bilingual lexicography, they justify an institutional label marking the level of a term’s divergence from its equivalent. The proposed approach shifts the description from merely stating cross-systemic differences towards explaining their mechanism. Institutional asymmetry is thus described as an ordered, graduated phenomenon, offering the notion of correspondence between terminological fields and legal institutions as an effective tool for comparative terminology studies beyond the examined language pair.

1. 18 U.S.C. § 3559. Sentencing classification of offenses. https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title18-section3559

2. Access to Justice Act 1999, c. 22 (UK). https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1999/22/contents

3. Andrianov, S. N., Berson, A. S., & Nikiforov, A. S. (1993). Anglo-russkiy yuridicheskiy slovar’ [English-Russian law dictionary]. Russkiy yazyk. (in Russian)

4. Arbitrazhnyy protsessual’nyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 24.07.2002 № 95-FZ [Arbitration Procedure Code of the Russian Federation of July 24, 2002, No. 95-FZ]. https://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_37800/ (in Russian)

5. Atabekova, A. A. (2013). Yuridicheskiy perevod v mezhdistsiplinarnom kontekste [Legal translation in an interdisciplinary context]. YUNITI-DANA. (in Russian)

6. Baldwin v. New York, 399 U.S. 66 (1970). https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/399/66/

7. Barrister. (n.d.). In Encyclopaedia Britannica. Retrieved August 17, 2026, from https:// www.britannica.com/topic/barrister

8. Become a magistrate. (n.d.). GOV.UK. Retrieved August 17, 2026, from https://www.gov.uk/become-magistrate

9. Bhatia, V. K. (1993). Analysing genre: Language use in professional settings. Longman.

10. Biel, Ł. (2018). Corpora in institutional legal translation: Small steps and the big picture. In F. Prieto Ramos (Ed.), Institutional translation for international governance (pp. 25– 36). Bloomsbury. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781474292320.0010

11. Black’s law dictionary (B. A. Garner, Ed.; 9th ed.). (2009). West.

12. BNC Consortium. (2007). The British National Corpus (XML ed.). Oxford Text Archive. https://www.english-corpora.org/bnc/

13. Borisenko, I. I., & Saenko, V. V. (2000). Russko-angliyskiy yuridicheskiy slovar’ [Russian-English law dictionary]. RUSSO. (in Russian)

14. Borisova, L. A. (2024). Osnovy yuridicheskogo perevoda [Foundations of legal translation]. R.Valent. (in Russian)

15. Bushev, A. B. (2010). Terminoobrazovanie v yuridicheskom diskurse i sposoby perevoda terminov [Term formation in legal discourse and methods of translating terms]. In N. D. Golev & T. V. Chernyshova (Eds.), Yurislingvistika-10: Lingvokonfliktologiya i yurisprudentsiya [Legal linguistics-10: Linguistic conflictology and jurisprudence] (pp. 21– 25). Altai State University Press. (in Russian)

16. Cao, D. (2007). Translating law. Multilingual Matters.

17. Cheng, L., & Sin, K. K. (2008). Terminological equivalence in legal translation: A semiotic approach. Semiotica, 172(1/4), 33–45. https://doi.org/10.1515/SEMI.2008.088

18. Courts Act 2003, c. 39 (UK). https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2003/39/contents

19. Courts and Tribunals Judiciary. (n.d.-a). District Judges (Magistrates’ Courts). Retrieved August 17, 2026, from https://www.judiciary.uk/about-the-judiciary/who-are-the-judiciary/judges/district-judge-mags-ct/

20. Courts and Tribunals Judiciary. (n.d.-b). Magistrates. Retrieved August 17, 2026, from https://www.judiciary.uk/about-the-judiciary/who-are-the-judiciary/magistrates/

21. Criminal Law Act 1967, c. 58 (UK). https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1967/58/contents

22. David, R., & Brierley, J. E. C. (1978). Major legal systems in the world today (2nd ed.). Free Press.

23. de Groot, G.-R. (2006). Legal translation. In J. M. Smits (Ed.), Elgar encyclopedia of comparative law (pp. 423–433). Edward Elgar.

24. Faculty of Advocates. (n.d.). History of Faculty. Retrieved August 17, 2026, from https://www.advocates.org.uk/faculty-of-advocates/history-of-faculty

25. Federal’nyy zakon ot 17.12.1998 № 188-FZ «O mirovykh sud’yakh v Rossiyskoy Federatsii» [Federal Law of December 17, 1998, No. 188-FZ “On Justices of the Peace in the Russian Federation”]. https://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_21335/ (in Russian)

26. Felony and misdemeanour. (n.d.). In Encyclopaedia Britannica. Retrieved August 17, 2026, from https://www.britannica.com/topic/felony

27. Fomina, I. N. (2019). Eurospeak and the Russian terminology of law: Translation challenges. Professional Discourse & Communication, 1(3), 41–49. https://doi.org/10.24833/2687-0126-2019-1-3-41-49

28. For Women Scotland Ltd v The Scottish Ministers [2025] UKSC 16. https://www.supremecourt.uk/cases/uksc-2024-0042

29. Garner, B. A. (1987). A dictionary of modern legal usage. Oxford University Press.

30. Golev, N. D. (Ed.). (1999). Yurislingvistika-1: Problemy i perspektivy [Legal linguistics-1: Problems and prospects]. Altai State University Press. (in Russian)

31. Grazhdanskiy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii (chast’ pervaya) ot 30.11.1994 № 51-FZ [Civil Code of the Russian Federation (Part One) of November 30, 1994, No. 51-FZ]. https://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_5142/ (in Russian)

32. Grazhdanskiy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii (chast’ vtoraya) ot 26.01.1996 № 14-FZ [Civil Code of the Russian Federation (Part Two) of January 26, 1996, No. 14-FZ]. https://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_9027/ (in Russian)

33. Grazhdanskiy protsessual’nyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 14.11.2002 № 138-FZ [Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation of November 14, 2002, No. 138-FZ]. https://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_39570/ (in Russian)

34. Grinev-Grinevich, S. V. (2008). Terminovedenie [Terminology science]. Akademiya. (in Russian)

35. Injunction. (n.d.). In Practical Law UK glossary. Thomson Reuters. Retrieved August 17, 2026, from https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/4-502-4584

36. Instructing barristers. (n.d.). COMBAR – The Commercial Bar Association. Retrieved August 17, 2026, from https://www.combar.com/about-us/instructing-barristers/

37. Kalmazova, N. A., Borisova, V. F., & Kuznetsova, Yu. A. (2020). English terms of terminological field legal profession: Motivation of choice and translation. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 2, Yazykoznanie, 19(3), 84–96. https://doi.org/10.15688/jvolsu2.2020.3.8 (in Russian)

38. Karasik, V. I. (2009). Kontsept kak edinitsa lingvokul’turnogo koda [The concept as a unit of linguistic cultural code]. Izvestiya Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta, (10), 4–11 (in Russian)

39. Khizhnyak, S. P. (1997). Yuridicheskaya terminologiya: Formirovanie i sostav [Legal terminology: Formation and composition]. Saratov University Press. (in Russian)

40. Khizhnyak, S. P. (2016). Kognitivnaya problematika v obshchey teorii termina [Cognitive aspects of the general theory of the term]. Nauka. (in Russian)

41. Komarova, Z. I. (2023). Semanticheskaya struktura spetsial’nogo slova i eyo leksikogra ficheskoe opisanie [The semantic structure of a special word and its lexicographic description] (2nd ed.). FLINTA. (in Russian)

42. Leichik, V. M. (2007). Terminovedenie: Predmet, metody, struktura [Terminology science: Subject, methods, structure] (3rd ed.). LKI. (in Russian)

43. Levitan, K. M. (2012). Yuridicheskiy perevod i sravnitel’noe pravovedenie [Legal translation and comparative law]. Rossiyskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal, (5), 46–54 (in Russian)

44. Mamulyan, A. S., & Kashkin, S. Yu. (1993). Anglo-russkiy polnyy yuridicheskiy slovar’ [Comprehensive English-Russian law dictionary]. Rabbit. (in Russian)

45. Martin, E. A. (Ed.). (1997). A dictionary of law (4th ed.). Oxford University Press.

46. Mattila, H. E. S. (2013). Comparative legal linguistics: Language of law, Latin and modern lingua francas (C. Goddard, Trans.; 2nd ed.). Ashgate.

47. Misdemeanor. (n.d.). In Wex. Legal Information Institute, Cornell Law School. Retrieved August 17, 2026, from https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/misdemeanor

48. Prieto Ramos, F. (Ed.). (2018). Institutional translation for international governance: Enhancing quality in multilingual legal communication. Bloomsbury.

49. Šarčević, S. (1997). New approach to legal translation. Kluwer Law International.

50. Solicitors Act 1974, c. 47 (UK). https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1974/47/contents

51. Superanskaya, A. V., Podolskaya, N. V., & Vasilyeva, N. V. (2012). Obshchaya termi nologiya: Voprosy teorii [General terminology: Theoretical issues] (6th ed.). LIBROKOM. (in Russian)

52. Supreme Court of Judicature Act 1873, 36 & 37 Vict. c. 66 (UK). https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Vict/36-37/66/contents

53. Supreme Court of Judicature Act 1875, 38 & 39 Vict. c. 77 (UK). https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Vict/38-39/77/contents

54. Ugolovnyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 13.06.1996 № 63-FZ [Criminal Code of the Russian Federation of June 13, 1996, No. 63-FZ]. https://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_10699/ (in Russian)

55. Vlasenko, S. V., & Zaslavskaya, V. A. (2015). Yuridicheskiy perevod v usloviyakh unifikatsii terminologii chastnogo prava [Legal translation under unification of private law terminology]. Vestnik Tverskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Filologiya, (4), 222–234 (in Russian)

56. Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 555 U.S. 7 (2008). https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/555/7/

57. Zweigert, K., & Kötz, H. (1998). An introduction to comparative law (T. Weir, Trans.; 3rd ed.). Clarendon Press.