Preview

Professional Discourse & Communication

Advanced search

FUNCTIONAL-LINGUISTIC PARAMETERS OF ENGLISH PROFESSIONAL DISCOURSE

https://doi.org/10.24833/2687-0126-2019-1-1-9-20

Full Text:

Abstract

This paper is devoted to basic functional-linguistic analysis of modern English professional and business discourse. The aim of this paper is to look at the phenomenon of modern English professional discourse from a functional-linguistic perspective to discuss key elements of verbal interaction that define rhetorical uniqueness of this type of communication and combine traditions, standards and conventional nature with enough freedom for speakers to express themselves and be creative in composing texts of their own. The author sums up different approaches to the definition of professional communication, singles out and describes major functional features of this type of verbal interaction: goal-setting, functional loading of professional communication, typical participants, chronotopos, forms of verbal behaviour, role and status relations, pragmatic conventions and standardization, etiquette, functional differences between official and semi-official professional discourse, peculiarities of written communication. All the above mentioned functional features of modern English professional discourse impose severe limitations on the speech arsenal available to people. Basic functionallinguistic analysis of discursive fragments reveals what aspects should be further elaborated on in terms of improving the process of strategic planning of speech, selecting proper linguistic means to cause appropriate pragmatic impact on listeners/ readers, work out ways to increase efficiency of rhetoric.

About the Author

D. S. Khramchenko
Moscow State Institute of International Relations (MGIMO University) of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Russia
Russian Federation


References

1. Banks, I. (2007). The Steep Approach to Garbadale. London: Abacus.

2. Bargiela-Chiappini, F. (2009). The Handbook of Business Discourse. Edinburgh University Press.

3. Bargiela-Chiappini, F., Nickerson, C., Planken, B. (2007). Business Discourse. Basingstoke, Hampshire; New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.

4. Beaugrande, R. de. (1997). The Story of Discourse Analysis. Discourse as Structure and Process. Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction. Ed. by T.A. van Dijk. Vol 1. London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi: SAGE Publications, 35-62.

5. Cotton, D., Falvey D., Kent S. (2006). Market Leader. New Edition. Upper Intermediate Business English Course Book. London: Pearson Education Limited.

6. Dijk, T. van (1981). Studies in the Pragmatics of Discourse. The Hague: Mouton.

7. Ponomarenko, E.V. (2017). Discourse functional relations revisited: mastering causativity as means of communicative impact. EDULEARN17 Proceedings, 4706-4712.

8. Garzone, G., Ilie, C. (2007). The Use of English in Institutional and Business Settings. An Intercultural Perspective. Bern: Peter Lang.

9. Gillaerts, P., Gotti, M. (2005). Genre Variation in Business Letters. Bern: Peter Lang.

10. Khramchenko, D. (2019). Evolution of Business English: Linguistic Problems & Teaching Practice. INTED2019 Proceedings. Valencia, Spain: IATED, 1292-1296.

11. Leech, G. (1983) Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.

12. Lees, G., Thorne, T. (1996). English on Business. Practical English for International Executives. Chancerel International Publishers.

13. Malahova, V.L. (2015). Vlijanie diskursivnogo prostranstva na formirovanie pritjazhatel’nogo smysla [Influence of discursive space on formation of possessive meaning]. Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki [Philology. Theory and practice], Tambov: Gramota, No 2(44), Issue 1, 138-140 (in Russian).

14. Malyuga E.N. (2015). Individual-oriented training in professional communication teaching. ICERI2015 Proceedings. 8th International Conference of Education, Research and Innovation. Seville, Spain, IATED, 4807-4811.

15. Malyuga E.N., Krouglov A, & Tomalin B. (2018). Linguo-cultural competence as a cornerstone of translators’ performance in the domain of intercultural business communication. XLinguae. A European Scientific Language Journal, issue no. 2. pp. 566-582. URL: http://www.xlinguae.eu/2018_11_02_46.html. DOI: 10.18355/XL.2018.11.02.46

16. Malyuga E.N., Ponomarenko E.V. (2012). Distance Teaching English for Specific Purposes (ESP). ICERI 2012: 5th international Conference on Education, Research and Innovation. Conference Proceedings. Edited by L. Gomez Chova, A. Lopez Martinez, I. Candel Torres; Madrid: International Association of Technology, Education and Development, IATED, 4530-4536.

17. Malyuga, E.N., Orlova, S.N. (2018). Linguistic pragmatics of intercultural professional and business communication. Monograph (pp. 1-145). Springer International Publishing AG. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68744-5

18. Morris, Ch. W. (1938). Foundations of the theory of signs. Chicago.

19. Ponomarenko E.V. (2016). Functional properties of English discourse in terms of linguosynergetics. 3rd International Multidisciplinary Scientific Conference on Social Sciences and Arts SGEM 2016, www.sgemsocial.org, SGEM2016 Conference Proceedings, 24-31 August, 2016, Book 1, Vol. 3, 355-362, doi: 10.5593/sgemsocial2016/B13/S03.042

20. Ponomarenko, E.V., Malyuga, E.N. (2015). Ironic rhetoric in business English courses from functional linguistics perspective. EDULEARN15 Proceedings, 1392-1396.

21. Seglin, J.L. (2002). The AMA Handbook of Business Letters. New York: AMACOM.

22. Talbot, F. (2009). How to Write Effective Business English. London: Kogan Page.

23. Weisberger, L. (2006). Everyone Worth Knowing. New York: Pocket Book.


For citation:


Khramchenko D.S. FUNCTIONAL-LINGUISTIC PARAMETERS OF ENGLISH PROFESSIONAL DISCOURSE. Professional Discourse & Communication. 2019;1(1):9-20. https://doi.org/10.24833/2687-0126-2019-1-1-9-20



Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2687-0126 (Online)