Preview

Professional Discourse & Communication

Advanced search

Academic authenticity of neuro-linguistic programming as a discursive practice

https://doi.org/10.24833/2687-0126-2019-1-4-33-44

Full Text:

Abstract

Neuro-linguistic programming (NLP) is considered to be one of the socially valued practices whose conceptual and methodological grounds can be articulated when seen in the light of its discursive representation. Characterization and evaluation of this area in applied psychology proceeds through analysis of expert standpoints and views rendered in secondary sources where they express the conformity level of the discourse in question to academic standards existent in psychology as a theory. Special attention is given to the propositional expression of the ideas defining NLP studies as well as to the exposure of presuppositional attitudes of the NLP expert whose textbook is under discussion in the article. The logical correctness and validity of those presuppositions are analyzed in relation to their adequate representation of scientific or mass worldview. After having exposed the author’s intentions one can state the pragmatic strategy and ideology pursued by the NLP expert in the textbook alongside with the identity of NLP as a discursive and social practice, its position among other discursive practices. The results obtained after the analysis of a particular piece of NLP discourse are congruent with the current trends typical of postmodernist consumerist society. Characteristic postmodernist ways to organize verbal interaction – in particular, forms of discourse imitation, its variation and hybridization – are found in the examples provided. A practical workbook on NLP in English was taken as a source for evidence. Critical discourse-analysis (CDA) served as the guiding approach to the problem, which was realized at some points of the study as contextual analysis, definitive analysis, interpretation method, statistical procedures altogether with quantitative estimation.

About the Author

Yu. V. Gilyasev
Pushkin Leningrad State University
Russian Federation


References

1. Baksansky, O.E., Coucher, E.N. (2007) Kognitivno-sinergeticheskaya paradigma NLP: Ot poznaniya k deistviyu [Cognitive and Synergetic Paradigm in NLP: From Learning to Action]. Moscow: LKI Publ. (in Russian)

2. Belyanin, V.P. (2004) Neiro-lingvisticheskoye programmirovaniye I oboucheniye inostrannym yazykam [Neuro-linguistic Programming and Foreign Language Teaching]. Moscowskiy psikhologicheskiy zhurnal, 1. Retrieved from: http://magazine.mospsy.ru/nomer1/b3.shtml (accessed: 05 December, 2019). (in Russian)

3. Brousenskaya, L.A., Koulikova, E.G. (2019) Imitatsionnost, informativnost I fatika v zhanrakh goumanitarnogo nauchnogo diskoursa [Imitation, Informational Value and Phatic Communication in the Genres of Academic Discourse]. Russian Journal of Linguistics, 23, № 1. Pp. 131-148. (in Russian)

4. Voroshilova, A.A. (2007) Antologiya nauchnykh issledovaniy v oblasti manipulyatsii soznaniyem [Anthology of Scientific Studies in the Field of Mind Manipulation]. Krasnoyarsk: Siberian State University of Science and Technology. (in Russian)

5. Yezhova, N.N. (2014) Kratkiy spravochnik practicheskogo psikhologa [Quick Reference Book of the Psychologist]. Rostov-on-Don, Russia: Pheniks. (in Russian)

6. Yeletskaya, Ye.A. (2009) Metody I priyemy NLP i kak oni rabotayut [Methods and Techniques of NLP and How They Work]. Rostov-on-Don, Russia: Pheniks. (in Russian)

7. Kovalyov, S.V. (2002) Vvedeniye v sovremennoye NLP. Psikhotekhnologii lichnostnoy effectivnosti [Introduction to Modern NLP. Psychotechnologies of Personal Efficiency]. Moscow: MPSU. (in Russian)

8. Ksenchouk, Ye.V. (2011) Sistemnoye myshleniye. Granitsy mentalnykh modeley i sistemnoye videniye mira [Systemic Thinking. Mental Models Limits and Systemic Outlook]. Moscow: Delo Publ. House of RANEPA. (in Russian)

9. Moiseyeva, L.V. (2015) NLP v obouchenii inostrannomu yazyku [NLP in Foreign Language Teaching]. In Troudy Orenbourgskogo institute (filiala) MGYuA, issue 25: proceedings (pp. 187-194). Orenbourg, Russia. (in Russian)

10. Nikolayev, N.S. (2015) Primeneniye NLP dlya povysheniya kachestva obrazovaniya [Using NLP to Improve the Quality of Education]. In Cherepovetskiye nauchnyye chteniya 2014: Russian Research and Practice Conference, Vol. 2: proceedings (pp. 172-174). Cherepovets, Russia: Cherepovets State University. (in Russian)

11. Oboukhova, Yu.V. (2016) Sovremennaya prakticheskaya psikhologiya v obespechenii resoursov samorealizatsii lichnosti [Modern Applied Psychology For Providing Resources For Personal Fulfilment]. Rostov-on-Don, Russia: SFedU. (in Russian)

12. Prokopieva, Ye.V. (2008) Dinamika predstavleniy o sebe v protsesse obouchayutchego NLP-treninga [Dynamics of Self Perception in the Course of NLP-training]. SeveroKavkazskiy psikhologicheskiy vestnik, 6/1. Rostov-on-Don, Russia: Kredo Publ. Pp. 8892. (in Russian)

13. Skorodoumova, O.B., Shpiz, Ye.G. (2019) Sovremennyye diskoussii o statuse NLP: persektivy I riski [Current Debates on NLP Status: Perspectives and Risks]. In Modern Science and Technology: International Research and Practice Conference, May 13th 2009: proceedings (pp. 52-59). Petrozavodsk, Russia: «Novaya nauka». (in Russian)

14. Smolova, L.V. (2017) Psikhologicheskoye konsultirovaniye [Counseling]. 3rd ed. Moscow: Flinta: Nauka. (in Russian)

15. Tairova, M.R. (2011) Ritoricheskiye priyemy, ispolzouyemyye v yazykovykh otsenochnyh manipoulyativnykh praktikakh [Rhetorical Techniques In Verbal Evaluative Practices of Manipulation]. Goumanitarnyye i sotsialno-ekonomicheskiye nauki, iss. 5. Rostov-on-Don, Russia: SFedU. Pp. 116-123. (in Russian)

16. Chernyavskaya, V.Ye. (2004) Interpretatsiya nauchnogo teksta [Interpreting Scientific Text]. St Petersburg: Nauka. (in Russian)

17. Cambridge Online Dictionary. Retrieved from: https://dictionary.cambridge.org/ (accessed: 05.12.2019)

18. Collins Online Dictionary. Retrieved from: https://www.collinsdictionary.com/ (accessed: 05.12.2019)

19. De Fina, A., Johnstone, B. (2015) Discourse Analysis and Narrative. In Tannen, D., Hamilton, H.E., Schiffrin, D. (Eds.). The Handbook of Discourse Analysis. 2nd ed. Vol. 1. (pp. 152-167). Chichester, UK: Blackwell Publishers.

20. Mayr, A. (2015) Institutional Discourse. In Tannen, D., Hamilton, H.E., Schiffrin, D. (Eds.). The Handbook of Discourse Analysis. 2nd ed. Vol. 2 (pp. 755-774). Chichester, UK: Blackwell Publishers.

21. O’Connor, J. (2002) The NLP Workbook. The Practical Guidebook to Achieving the Results You Want. London, UK: HarperCollinsPublishers, Element.

22. Sornig, K. (1989) Some remarks on linguistic strategies of persuasion. In Wodak, R. (Ed.) Language, Power and Ideology: Studies in Political Discourse. Interdisciplinary Approaches to Language, Discourse and Ideology, vol. 7 (pp. 95-113). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publ. Comp.

23. Van Dijk, T.N. (2015) Critical Discourse Analysis In Tannen, D., Hamilton, H.E., Schiffrin, D. (Eds.). The Handbook of Discourse Analysis. 2nd ed. Vol. 1 (pp. 466-485). Chichester, UK: Blackwell Publishers.


For citation:


Gilyasev Y.V. Academic authenticity of neuro-linguistic programming as a discursive practice. Professional Discourse & Communication. 2019;1(4):33-44. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/2687-0126-2019-1-4-33-44



Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2687-0126 (Online)