Language, Politics, and Identity: an Interdisciplinary Investigation of Modern Political Discourse
https://doi.org/10.24833/2687-0126-2023-5-2-31-45
Abstract
The article discusses an interdisciplinary approach to the study of political discourse on the example of linguistic and political science studies devoted to the manifestation of national identity in the speeches of German politicians. The relevance is explained by the fact that the article for the first time considers the use of an interdisciplinary approach in the analysis of professional discourse by specialists from different scientific fields. The purpose of the work is to show how an interdisciplinary approach is implemented in the study of political discourse by linguists and political scientists. Both studies were carried out on the empirical material of 60 texts of public speeches by leading German politicians (H. Maas, Z. Gabriel, F.-W. Steinmeier, A. Merkel, O. Scholz, U. von der Leyen) at international and national events such as the Munich Security Conference, the UN General Assembly, government statements. Both studies used general scientific methods (description, analysis, continuous sampling method), as well as quantitative content analysis (political scientists) and statistical methods of the chi-square test and Cramer’s coefficient (linguists). The use of these methods led both research groups to approximately the same conclusions: German politicians tend to avoid emphasizing ethnic identity in their speeches on the international agenda, which is reflected in the language choices. The analysis by linguists of culture-bound elements with the help of the chi-square test showed that the elements of non-German realities predominate in the speeches. The content analysis carried out by political scientists revealed that the leading German politicians tend not to demonstrate their national identity, giving priority to positioning Germany as a member of the EU and NATO.
About the Authors
M. A. Chigasheva
MGIMO University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Marina A. Chigasheva, Cand. Sci. (Philology), is the Head of the Department of the German language
Moscow
M. A. Yelizaryeva
MGIMO University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Maria A. Yelizaryeva, Cand. Sci. (Philology), is an Associate Professor in the Department of the German language
Moscow
V. A. Nagumanova
MGIMO University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Vera A. Nagumanova, Cand. Sci. (Philology), is a Senior Lecturer in the Department of the German language
Moscow
E. A. Makushkina
MGIMO University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Ekaterina A. Makushkina is a Bachelor’s degree student at the Faculty of International Journalism
Moscow
References
1. Artem’eva, T.V., Smirnov, I.P., Tropp, E.A., Tul’chinskij, G.L., & Epshtejn, M.N. (2003). Proektivnyj filosofskij slovar’ [The Projective Philosophical Dictionary]. Saint-Petersburg (in Russian).
2. Ashurova, D.U. (2021). Mezhdisciplinarnyj podhod k issledovaniyu yazyka [Interdisciplinary approach to language research]. Nizhnevartovskij filologicheskij vestnik [Nizhnevartovsk Philological Bulletin], 2, 127-137. doi:10.36906/2500-1795/21-2/11 (in Russian).
3. Van Dijk, T. A. (1998). K opredeleniyu diskursa [To the definition of discourse]. London: Sage (in Russian).
4. Kasavin, I.T. (editor-in-chief) (2010). Mezhdisciplinarnost’ v naukah i filosofii [Interdisciplinarity in Sciences and Philosophy]. Ros. akad. nauk, In-t filosofii [Russian Academy of Sciences, Institute of Philosophy]. Moscow: IFRAN (in Russian).
5. Kaufova, I.B., & Kaufova, L.A. (2018). Nacional’naya identichnost’ v britanskom politicheskom diskurse [National identity in British Political Discourse]. Sovremennye issledovaniya social’nyh problem [Modern studies of social problems], 10 (4-3), 86–97. doi:10.12731/2077-1770-2018-4-3-86-97 (in Russian).
6. Kostomarov, P.I. (2014). Antropotsentrizm kak vazhneyshiy priznak sovremennoy lingvistiki [Anthropocentrism as an important feature of modern linguistics]. Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [SibScript], (2-1), 198-203 (in Russian.)
7. Kubryakova, E.S. (2004). Yazyk i znanie [Language and knowledge]. Moscow: Yazyki slavyanskoj kul’tury [Languages of Slavic culture] (in Russian).
8. Kudryavcev, A.G. (2010). Vyrazhenie nacional’noj identichnosti v politicheskom diskurse: funkcii i mekhanizmy vozdejstviya na recipienta soobshcheniya [Expression of national identity in political discourse: functions and mechanisms of influence on the recipient of the message]. Politicheskaya lingvistika [Political Linguistics], 4 (34), 115–117 (in Russian).
9. Lappo, M.A. (2014). Sushchnost’ identichnosti i metody yeyo analiza v lingvisticheskih/psiholingvisticheskih issledovaniyah [The essence of identity and methods of its analysis in linguistic/psycholinguistic studies]. Voprosy psiholingvistiki [Questions of psycholinguistics], 19, 30-39 (in Russian).
10. Lysak, I.V. (2016). Mezhdisciplinarnost’: preimushchestva i problemy primeneniya [Interdisciplinarity: advantages and problems of application]. Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya [Modern problems of science and education], 5. Retrieved from https://www.scienceeducation.ru/ru/article/view?id=25376 (accessed: 16 April, 2023) (in Russian).
11. Orlov, B.S. (2012). Problemy identichnosti v sovremennoj Germanii: analiticheskij obzor [Problems of identity in modern Germany: an analytical review]. Moscow: INION. Retrieved from https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/problemy-identichnosti-v-sovremennoy-germanii (accessed: 16 April, 2023) (in Russian).
12. Repina, L.P. (2011). Istoricheskaya nauka na rubezhe XX–XXI vv.: social’nye teorii i istoriograficheskaya praktika [Historical science at the turn of the XX–XXI centuries: social theories and historiographical practice]. Moscow: Krug (in Russian).
13. Rumyanceva, M.F. (2007). Celostnost’ sovremennogo gumanitarnogo znaniya: neobhodimost’ i vozmozhnost’ [Integrity of modern humanitarian knowledge: necessity and possibility]. Edinstvo gumanitarnogo znaniya: novyj sintez: Materialy XIX mezhdunarodnoi nauchnoi konferentsii [Unity of humanitarian knowledge: a new synthesis: proceedings of the 19th international scientific conference], Moscow, 25-27 January, 2007 (pp. 41-49) (in Russian).
14. Safran, U. (2011). Nacional’naya identichnost’ vo Francii, Germanii i SShA: sovremennye spory [National identity in France, Germany and the USA: modern disputes]. Politicheskaya nauka [Political Science], 1, 64–97. Retrieved from https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/natsionalnaya-identichnost-vo-frantsii-germanii-i-ssha-sovremennye-spory (accessed: 16 April, 2023) (in Russian).
15. Slyusarev, D.S. (2012). Lingvostilisticheskie osobennosti zhanra «pravitel’stvennoe zayavlenie »: na materiale vystuplenij nemeckih bundeskanclerov [Linguistic and stylistic features of the genre of «government statement»: based on the material of speeches by German Bundeskanzlers]. Vestnik Cherepoveckogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Bulletin of Cherepovets State University], 2-2 (39), 137–139 (in Russian).
16. Ujbo, A.S. (1990). Rekonstrukciya istoricheskogo proshlogo kak mezhdisciplinarnaya zadacha [Reconstruction of the historical past as an interdisciplinary task]. Smyslovye koncepty istoriko-filosofskogo znaniya: Uchen. zap. Tartus. un-ta: Trudy po filosofii XXXV [Semantic concepts of historical and philosophical knowledge: Scientific notes of the University of Tartu: Works on philosophy XXXV], 76-92 (in Russian).
17. Hamdamova, D. (2021). Printsip antropotsentrizma v sovremennoy lingvistike: obzor, predposylki i tendentsii razvitiya [The principle of anthropocentrism in modern linguistics: an overview, prerequisites and development trends]. Obshchestvo i innovatsii [Society and innovations], 2, 221-227. doi:10.47689/2181-1415-vol2-iss5/S-pp221-227 (in Russian).
18. Hauer-Tyukarkina, O.M. (2013). Diskurs nacional’nogo v sovremennom nemeckom obshchestve [The discourse on the issue of nationality in modern German society]. Politiya, 4 (71), 67–78. doi:10.30570/2078-5089-2013-71-4-67-78 (in Russian).
19. Chigasheva, M.A., Elizar’eva, M.A., Larina, T.S., & Kryachkova, A.P. (2021). Kul’turno-markirovannaya leksika politicheskogo diskursa Germanii: monografiya [Culturally Marked Vocabulary of German Political Discourse: Monograph]. Moscow: MGIMO-Universitet (in Russian).
20. Shiryaev, N.S. (2017). Kommunikativnye strategii reprezentacii nacional’noj identichnosti v politicheskom mediadiskurse (na materiale anglijskogo i francuzskogo yazykov) [Communicative strategies of representation of national identity in political media discourse (based on the material of English and French)] (Candidate’s thesis). Saratov (in Russian).
21. Bschleipfer, A. (2010). Der «caso Parmalat» in der Berichterstattung italienischer Printund Rundfunkmedien. Eine Studie zur sprachlichen Markierung von Corporate Identity, lokaler und nationaler Identität [The case of Parmalat in the reporting of Italian print and radio media. A study on the linguistic marking of corporate identity, local and national identity]. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang. doi:10.3726/978-3-653-00122-8 (in German).
22. Coulmas, F. (1985). Sprache und Staat: Studien zur Sprachplanung und Sprachpolitik [Language and the State: Studies in Language Planning and Language Policy]. Berlin; New York: Walter de Gruyter. doi:10.1515/9783110852752 (in German).
23. Gaskarth, J., & Oppermann, K. (2021). Clashing traditions: German foreign policy in a New Era. International Studies Perspectives, 22.1, 84–105. doi:10.1093/isp/ekz017
24. Habermas, J. (1989). Erläuterungen zum Begriff des kommunikativen Handelns [Explanations on the concept of communicative action]. In J. Habermas Vorstudien und Ergänzungen zur Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns [Preliminary studies and additions to the theory of communicative action] (571-606), Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verl. (in German).
25. Hermann, E. (2021). Die Regierungserklärungen der Bundeskanzlerin Dr. Angela Merkel. Eine vergleichende machtpolitische Analyse [The Government Statements by Chancellor Dr. Angela Merkel. A comparative political analysis]. München: GRIN Verlag (in German).
26. Jacobs, H.H., & Borland, J.H. (1986). The Interdisciplinary Concept Model: Theory and Practice. Gifted Child Quarterly, 30 (4), 159-163. doi:10.1177/001698628603000403
27. Piaget, J. (1972). The epistemology of interdisciplinary relationships. In A. Briggs et al. (Eds.). Interdisciplinarity, Problems of teaching and research in Universities (127-139), Paris: OECD.
28. Thim-Mabrey, Ch. (2003). Sprachidentität – Identität durch Sprache. Ein Problemaufriss aus sprachwissenschaftlicher Sicht [Language Identity – Identity Through Language. An outline of the problem from a linguistic point of view]. In N. Janich, Ch. Thim-Mabrey (Eds.). Sprachidentität – Identität durch Sprache [Language identity – identity through language] (1-18), Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag (in German). Retrieved from https://www.narr.de/sprachidentit%C3%A4t-identit%C3%A4t-durch-sprache-15761-2/ (accessed: 15 March, 2023) (in German).
Review
For citations:
Chigasheva M.A., Yelizaryeva M.A., Nagumanova V.A., Makushkina E.A. Language, Politics, and Identity: an Interdisciplinary Investigation of Modern Political Discourse. Professional Discourse & Communication. 2023;5(2):31-45. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/2687-0126-2023-5-2-31-45
Email this article 