Preview

Professional Discourse & Communication

Advanced search

Dynamics of the cold war concept’s figurative component in the US political discourse

https://doi.org/10.24833/2687-0126-2020-2-1-10-22

Full Text:

Abstract

The article presents the results of a study aimed at analyzing the dynamics of the development of the COLD WAR concept’s figurative component in political discourse based on the material of the American media. The research conducted using the methods of discursive, conceptualdefinitional and comparative analysis has shown that the COLD WAR concept is a complex multi-component concept-scenario (or dynamic frame) that evolved during the second half of the 20th century. The figurative component of the concept manifests itself in its metaphorization and develops as the concept penetrates into the American mass consciousness. Throughout its history the COLD WAR concept has been both the source domain and the target domain of metaphorization with numerous models of metaphorical reinterpretation. Moreover, the author states that demetaphorization of the concept has also played a big part in the development of its figurative component. The article opens up a perspective for the study of the conceptual field of the “cold war” in different linguocultures, which is very important considering the changing international situation and the emergence of such concepts as COLD WAR 2, COLD WAR 2.0, etc.

About the Author

N. A. Kovalev
MGIMO University
Russian Federation
Moscow


References

1. Babushkin, A.P. (1996). Tipy konceptov v leksiko-frazeologicheskoj semantike jazyka [Concept types in the lexical and phraseological semantics of a language]. Voronezh: VSU (in Russian).

2. Chudinov, A.P. (2011). Sovremennaja politicheskaja lingvistika: uchebnoe posobie [Modern political linguistics: a textbook]. Ekateriburg: USPU (in Russian).

3. Cowley, R. (Ed.). (2006). The Cold War: a military history. Random House.

4. Crockatt, R. (1994). The fifty years war: the United States and the Soviet Union in world politics, 1941-1991. London; New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.

5. Dem’jankov, V.Z. (1994). Kognitivnaja lingvistika kak raznovidnost’ interpretirujushhego podhoda [Cognitive linguistics as a type of interpretive approach]. Voprosy jazykoznanija [Issues of linguistics], 4, 17-33 (in Russian).

6. Dijk, T.A. van. (Ed.). (1997). Discourse as structure and process. Discourse studies: A multidisciplinary introduction. Volume 1. London; Thousand Oaks; New Delhi: Sage Publication.

7. Dockrill, M.L., & Hopkins, M.F. (2006). The Cold War, 1945-1991. 2 nd edition. Palgrave Macmillan.

8. Egorova, N.I. (2003). Holodnaja vojna. 1945-1963 gg. Istoricheskaja retrospektiva. [Cold War. 1945-1963. Historical retrospective]. Moscow: OLMA-PRESS (in Russian).

9. Gaddis, J.L. (1998). We now know: rethinking Cold War history. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

10. Halliday, M.A.K. (1978). Language as social semiotic: the social interpretation of language and meaning. London: Arnold.

11. Karasik, V.I. (2002). Jazykovoj krug: lichnost’, koncepty, diskurs [Language circle: personality, concepts, discourse]. Volgograd: Peremena (in Russian).

12. Kendall, B. (2017). The Cold War: a new oral history of life between East and West. BBC Books.

13. Kovalev, N.A. (2017). Razvitie koncepta “HOLODNAJA VOJNA” v politicheskom diskurse (na materiale amerikanskih SMI) [Development of the “COLD WAR” concept in political discourse (based on the material of the American media)]. Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki [Philological science. Issues of theory and practice], 7 (73), part 1, 98-102 (in Russian).

14. Kubrjakova, E.S., Dem’jankov, V.Z., Pankrac, Ju.G., & Luzina, L.G. (1996). Kratkij slovar’ kognitivnyh terminov [Concise dictionary of cognitive terms]. Moscow: MSU (in Russian).

15. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2003). Metaphors we live by. London: University of Chicago Press.

16. Leffler, M.P., & Westad, O.A. (2010). The Cambridge history of the Cold War: Volume 1, Origins. Cambridge University Press. 17. Minsky, M. (1975). A framework for representing knowledge. In P. Winston (Eds.) The psychology of computer vision, New York: McGraw-Hill, 211-77.

17. Orwell, G. (1945). You and the atomic bomb. Tribune; London.

18. Shejgal, E.I. (2000). Semiotika politicheskogo diskursa [Semiotics of political discourse]. Volgograd: Peremena (in Russian). 20. Tolstaja, S.M. (2004). “Chelovek zhivet, kak trava rastet”: vegetativnaja metafora chelovecheskoj zhizni [“A person lives like grass grows”: vegetative metaphor of human life]. Sokrovennye smysly. Slovo. Tekst. Kul’tura [Hidden senses. Word. Text. Culture], Moscow, 685-693 (in Russian).


For citation:


Kovalev N.A. Dynamics of the cold war concept’s figurative component in the US political discourse. Professional Discourse & Communication. 2020;2(1):10-22. https://doi.org/10.24833/2687-0126-2020-2-1-10-22



Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2687-0126 (Online)