PHILOSOPHICAL AND LINGUISTIC ASPECTS OF THE NOTION OF ‘CONCEPT’ (AS EXEMPLIFIED BY THE CONCEPT OF ‘MEDICINE’ VERBALISATION IN ENGLISH MEDICAL DISCOURSE )
https://doi.org/10.24833/2687-0126-2019-1-1-70-82
Abstract
Various philosophical and linguistic aspects of the notion of ‘concept’ are considered and exemplified by revealing and systematizing verbal markers of the concept of ‘medicine’ in English medical discourse. The present research is motivated by the current renovations within the modern medical paradigm and by the application of new medical terms registered both in dictionaries or reference books for medical professionals and in popular newspaper articles. The adequate interpretation of different visions of the notion of ‘concept’ in the classical studies by linguistic and philosophical authors contributes to identifying the key verbal characteristics of the concept of ‘medicine’ in English discourse. The analysis of lexicographic discourse reveals the semantic parameters of medical terminological markers according to which they are grouped into monosemantic and multivalued language units. Furthermore, the etymological aspects of the verbal units under consideration are also described. Multivalued terminological units are characterized by a significant semantic potential and are considered as a reliable basis for further semantic development of modern English vocabulary. Within the English educational discourse, the concept of ‘medicine’ is verbalized by medical linguistic markers concerning proper nutrition, daily schedule and health destructive factors. The studies of media resources referring to the concept of ‘medicine’show that advertising of medical treatment or pills providing for a healthy life-style is usually accompanied by anti-advertising of medical products harmful for human health. The description of medical terms within the frames of lexicographic, educational, and massmedia sources contributes to a valid interpretation of the ‘medicine’ concept in modern English worldview, which is of vital importance today since valid comprehension of modern medical problems in terms of its successes and failures contributes to effective critical thinking training schemes and further development of both national and international philosophical culture.
About the Authors
A. A. KharkovskayaRussian Federation
A. A. Golubyh
Russian Federation
References
1. Apresjan, Ju.D. (1993-1994). Novyj bol’shoj anglo-russkij slovar’ v treh tomah [New unabridged English-Russian dictionary in three volumes]. Moscow: Russkij Jazyk.
2. Arutjunova, N.D. (1993). Logicheskij analiz jazyka. Mental’nye dejstvija [Logical analysis of a language. Mental actions]. Moscow: Nauka (in Russian)
3. Arutjunova, N.D. (1999). Jazyk i mir cheloveka [The language and world of an individual]. Moscow: Jazyki russkoj kul’tury (in Russian).
4. Boldyrev, N.N. (2001). Koncept i znachenie slova [The concept and meaning of a word]. Metodologicheskie problemy kognitivnoj lingvistiki [Methodological problems of cognitive linguistics], Voronezh, 25-36 (in Russian).
5. Chakina, E.A. (2013). Reprezentacija konceptov “lichnost’” i “person / personality” v russkoj i anglijskoj jazykovyh kartinah mira [Representation of the concepts of “person” and “personality” in the Russian and English language pictures of the world] (Candidate thesis). Stavropol State Pedagogical Institute, Stavropol, Russia (in Russian).
6. Daily Mail. Associated Newspapers Ltd, 2016. Retrieved from http://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/ (accessed: 2 March, 2019).
7. Daily Mirror. MGN Limited, 2016. Retrieved from http://www.mirror.co.uk/ (accessed: 21 February, 2019).
8. Delez, Zh., & Gvattari, F. (1998). Chto takoe filosofija? [What is philosophy? Moscow: Institut jeksperimental’noj sociologii (in Russian).
9. Evening Standard. Evening Standard Limited, 2016. Retrieved from http://www.standard.co.uk/ (accessed: 14 January, 2019).
10. Holod, Ju.S. (2018). Koncept i konceptualizacija v zarubezhnoj lingvisticheskoj paradigme [Concept and conceptualization in the foreign linguistic paradigm]. Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. [Philology. Theory and practice], Tambov: Gramota, 173-176 (in Russian).
11. Hrustalev, Ju.M., & Caregorodcev, G.I. (2005). Filosofija nauki i mediciny: uchebnik dlja aspirantov i soiskatelej kandidatskoj stepeni v oblasti mediciny i farmacii, a takzhe ih nauchnyh rukovoditelej [The philosophy of science and medicine: a textbook for graduate students and applicants for a PhD degree in medicine and pharmacy, as well as for their supervisors]. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media (in Russian).
12. Karasik, V.I. (2002). Jazykovoj krug: lichnost’, koncepty, diskurs [Language circle:personality, concepts, discourse]. Volgograd: Peremena (in Russian).
13. Kirilenko, E.I. (2009). Medicina kak fenomen kul’tury [Medicine as a cultural phenomenon] (Doctoral thesis). Tomsk (in Russian)
14. Knigin, A.N. (1999). Filosofskie problemy soznanija [Philosophical problems of consciousness]. Tomsk: Izd-vo Tom. un-ta (in Russian).
15. Levelt, W.J.M. (1993). Speaking: from intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
16. Longman dictionary of contemporary English for advanced learners. Pearson Longman, 2009.
17. Neretina, S.S. (2009). Koncept [The concept]. Jenciklopedija jepistemologii i filosofii nauki [Encyclopedia of epistemology and philosophy of science], Moscow: Kanon+; ROON “Reabilitacija”, 387-389 (in Russian).
18. Neretina, S.S. (1994). Slovo i tekst v srednevekovoj kul’ture. Konceptualizm Petra Abeljara [Word and text in the medieval culture. Conceptualism of Peter Abelard]. Moscow: Gnozis (in Russian).
19. Online etymology dictionary. Retrieved from http://www.etymonline.com/ (accessed: 3 March, 2019).
20. Pavilenis, R.I. (1983). Problema smysla [A problem of the meaning]. Moscow: Mysl’ (in Russian).
21. Rorty, R. (1982). Philosophy as a kind of writing: An essay on Derrida. Consequences of pragmatism, Brighton, 100-108.
22. Slyshkin, G.G. (2000). Ot teksta k simvolu: lingvokul’turnye koncepty precedentnyh tekstov v soznanii i diskurse [From text to symbol: linguocultural concepts of precedent texts in consciousness and discourse]. Moscow: Academia (in Russian).
23. Sternin, I.A. (2001). Metodika issledovanija struktury koncepta [The methodology of research of the concept structure]. Metodologicheskie problemy kognitivnoj lingvistiki [Methodological problems of cognitive linguistics], Voronezh, 58-65 (in Russian).
24. Surzhanskaja, Ju.V. (2011). Koncept kak filosofskoe ponjatie [Concept as a philosophical notion]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filosofija. Sociologija. Politologija. [Tomsk State University Herald. Philosophy. Sociology. Political science], 2(14), 70-78 (in Russian).
25. Talmy, L. (2000). Toward a cognitive semantics. Cambridge/London: The MIT Press, Vol. 1.
Review
For citations:
Kharkovskaya A.A., Golubyh A.A. PHILOSOPHICAL AND LINGUISTIC ASPECTS OF THE NOTION OF ‘CONCEPT’ (AS EXEMPLIFIED BY THE CONCEPT OF ‘MEDICINE’ VERBALISATION IN ENGLISH MEDICAL DISCOURSE ). Professional Discourse & Communication. 2019;1(1):70-82. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/2687-0126-2019-1-1-70-82